THE CONCEPT OF ASSIGNMENT OF DECREE-DEBT

Authors

  • Pallavi Gupta Senior Research Associate, O.P. Jindal Global Law School Author
  • Shivam Goel Co-Founder, Lex Unified Author

Downloads

Abstract

In the matter of: Commissioner of Wealth Tax V/s Pierce Leslie & Co. Ltd., AIR 1963 Mad 356, relying upon the report in the matter of: Webb V/s Stenton, (1883) 11 QBD 518, it was observed that the essential requisites of a debt are: (1) An ascertained or readily calculable amount; (2) An absolute unqualified and present liability in regard to the amount with the obligation to pay forthwith or in future within an ascertained time; (3) The obligation must have accrued and be subsisting and should not be that which is merely accruing. Thus, a contingent liability or a contingency debt is neither a liability nor a debt. A debt is a debitum in praesenti, solvendum in futuro.

Readership Data

🌐

Refreshing Cached Analytics Data

The cached analytics data has become stale and journal.thelawbrigade.com is making a fresh request to fetch the latest data from Google Analytics. This may take 20-30 seconds depending on the server response time from Google Analytics. Please do not close the browser during this time. We appreciate your patience.

Published

10-08-2020

License

Copyright © 2026 by Pallavi Gupta, Shivam Goel

The copyright and license terms mentioned on this page take precedence over any other license terms mentioned on the article full text PDF or any other material associated with the article.

How to Cite

Gupta, Pallavi, and Shivam Goel. “THE CONCEPT OF ASSIGNMENT OF DECREE-DEBT”. Law & Political Review, vol. 5, Aug. 2020, pp. 40-48, https://journal.thelawbrigade.com/lpr/article/view/755.