WHEN POLICE AND COURTS DIFFER IN TAKING COGNIZANCE OF OFFENCES
Downloads
Keywords:
Cognizance, Difference of opinion, Court, Police, SheriffAbstract
Under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC), a Criminal Court can take cognizance of offences and is not bound by the view taken by the Police in their report u/s 169 of the CrPC.
While administration of justice falls within the sole purview of Courts of law, the process of administration of justice requires the performance of some tasks which require the use of coercive power, which no department other than the Police are equipped to perform.
In serious cases where the Police as an investigating agency have taken a view that a particular accused person need not be proceeded against and where the Court takes a contrary stance and takes cognizance of offences qua such a person, the same Police agency is called upon to assist in performing the aforementioned tasks. While it may not per se interfere with the administration of justice, the fundamental principle of justice, that justice must not only be done but must most manifestly and undoubtedly be seen to be done, comes under a shadow of doubt under the present system.
The system of Sheriffs and Marshals in the United States, independent of the Police, take care of the ministerial tasks of trial.
The present Comment seeks to study the present state of the system under the CrPC and to make suggestions for incorporating into it the system of Sheriffs as a uniformed, trained, armed civil service under the command of Courts of law.
External References to this Article
Loading reference data...
License Terms
Ownership and Licensing:
Authors of research papers submitted to any journal published by The Law Brigade Publishers retain the copyright of their work while granting the journal specific rights. Authors maintain ownership of the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication. Simultaneously, authors agree to license their research papers under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License.
License Permissions:
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 License, others are permitted to share and adapt the work, even for commercial purposes, provided that appropriate attribution is given to the authors, and acknowledgment is made of the initial publication by The Law Brigade Publishers. This license encourages the broad dissemination and reuse of research papers while ensuring that the original work is properly credited.
Additional Distribution Arrangements:
Authors are free to enter into separate, non-exclusive contractual arrangements for distributing the published version of the work (e.g., posting it to institutional repositories or publishing it in books), provided that the original publication by The Law Brigade Publishers is acknowledged.
Online Posting:
Authors are encouraged to share their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on personal websites) both prior to submission and after publication. This practice can facilitate productive exchanges and increase the visibility and citation of the work.
Responsibility and Liability:
Authors are responsible for ensuring that their submitted research papers do not infringe on the copyright, privacy, or other rights of third parties. The Law Brigade Publishers disclaims any liability for any copyright infringement or violation of third-party rights within the submitted research papers.
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright © 2026 by Aaditya Gore
The copyright and license terms mentioned on this page take precedence over any other license terms mentioned on the article full text PDF or any other material associated with the article.
