PUBLIC SERVANT DEFINITION UNDER PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT 1988 - EVOLUTION SCOPE AND CHALLENGES
Downloads
Abstract
Prevention of Corruption Act 1988 was enacted as a strong and effective machinery to prevent corruption among public servant. It replaced the earlier legislation, Prevention of Corruption Act 1947. Since both these legislations are exclusively to deal with corruption of public servants, it is very relevant to define the term ‘public servant’ explicitly for the better administration of the Act. ‘Public servant’ must be considered with a unique perspective in all anti-corruption laws, since being a public servant is the core deciding factor at the threshold of each one’s liability.
Prevention of Corruption Act 1988: Evolution and History
As a consequence of various wars there was a scarcity of necessary goods, which had necessitated a post-war reconstruction by imposing certain controls and extensive schemes. Huge sums of money were entrusted with public servants in these programs. This wide discretion may have had enticed them to the glittering shine of wealth and property. The existing legislations including the provisions of the Indian Penal Code were found to be inadequate to deal with the growing menace of corruption. A Specific legislation exclusively to combat corruption was the need of the hour. Hence the Prevention of Corruption Act 1947(herein after called PC Act) was enacted. The preamble of the Act clearly states that the Act has been passed for more effective control and prevention of bribery and corruption. Bribery is addressed as a form of corruption which is rampant among public servants. On the other hand, the Act does not define the term ‘public servant’ even if ‘public servants’ alone will fall under the purview of the mischief in this Act. For the purpose of the interpretation of the term public servant it has adopted the definition given under section 21 of IPC. In State of M.P v M.V Narasimhan, after considering the object of the legislation the Supreme Court had observed certain fundamental difference between the Indian Penal Code and the PC Act 1947. It was held that the PC Act 1947 was not in pari materia with IPC. PC Act 1947 is a self-contained statute with its own provision and created a specific offence of criminal misconduct, which was quite different from the offence of bribery as defined in the Indian Penal Code. The prevention of Corruption Act is a specific legislation intended to eradicate the evil of corruption among public servant whereas the penal code is a penal legislation which is wider and is generally applicable. No doubt, the PC Act has contained certain penal provisions but it was in effect a social piece of legislation aiming at the eradication of corruption among public servant.
External References to this Article
Loading reference data...
License Terms
Ownership and Licensing:
Authors of research papers submitted to any journal published by The Law Brigade Publishers retain the copyright of their work while granting the journal specific rights. Authors maintain ownership of the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication. Simultaneously, authors agree to license their research papers under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License.
License Permissions:
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 License, others are permitted to share and adapt the work, even for commercial purposes, provided that appropriate attribution is given to the authors, and acknowledgment is made of the initial publication by The Law Brigade Publishers. This license encourages the broad dissemination and reuse of research papers while ensuring that the original work is properly credited.
Additional Distribution Arrangements:
Authors are free to enter into separate, non-exclusive contractual arrangements for distributing the published version of the work (e.g., posting it to institutional repositories or publishing it in books), provided that the original publication by The Law Brigade Publishers is acknowledged.
Online Posting:
Authors are encouraged to share their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on personal websites) both prior to submission and after publication. This practice can facilitate productive exchanges and increase the visibility and citation of the work.
Responsibility and Liability:
Authors are responsible for ensuring that their submitted research papers do not infringe on the copyright, privacy, or other rights of third parties. The Law Brigade Publishers disclaims any liability for any copyright infringement or violation of third-party rights within the submitted research papers.
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright © 2026 by Premalatha B.
The copyright and license terms mentioned on this page take precedence over any other license terms mentioned on the article full text PDF or any other material associated with the article.
