Protecting Indigenous Knowledge in Cameroon: Challenges Within the Intellectual Property Law System

Ndi Chancelin Titi

doi:10.55662/JLSR.2025.11403

Authors

Ndi Chancelin Titi 3th year PhD student, University of Yaounde II soa, Cameroon Author

Downloads

PDF

PlumX DOI based Article Level Metrics

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55662/JLSR.2025.11403

Keywords:

Indigenous/Traditional Knowledge, Traditional Cultural Expressions, Genetic Resources, Intellectual Property rights

Abstract

Traditional knowledge (TK) refers to the time-honored wisdom, teachings, and practices passed on through generations in indigenous cultures. This knowledge is expressed in various forms, including medicine, agriculture, ecology, music, dance, stories, and spiritual and artistic expressions. This study explores the challenges of protecting indigenous knowledge in Cameroon under current intellectual property laws. Despite the rich cultural heritage of indigenous communities, particularly in developing countries, the existing legal framework is often insufficient. The article highlights the conflict between the Western-style intellectual property system, which focuses on individual ownership and the communal nature of indigenous knowledge. The research aims to identify the specific obstacles to protecting TK in developing countries, with a focus on Cameroon. Using a qualitative research approach, the study found that indigenous populations, especially in Cameroon, face significant challenges that hinder the effective protection of their traditional knowledge within the intellectual property system. To address the issues highlighted in our findings, the research identifies the reasons why protecting indigenous knowledge seems unattainable. This article concludes by identifying these challenges and offering recommendations to address these gaps.

External References to this Article

Loading reference data...

References

Thomas C. & Marion P., (2008), Legal Perspectives on Traditional Knowledge: The Case for Intellectual Property Protection (Journal of International Economic Law, Vol. 7, Issue 2, pp. 375-376).

Walter B., (2010), Sharing Bioprospecting Benefits: Fight a losing battle? Available at the Jakarta post archives, Accessed on the 24th June 2025.

Rosendal G. K., (1995), ‘The Convention on Biological Diversity: A Viable Instrument for Conservation and Sustainable Use’, in Herge Ole Bergesen, George Parmann and Thommessen B. (eds), Green Globe Yearbook of International Co-operation on Environment and Development 1995 (oxford: Oxford University Press) 69-81.

The US patent law provides that; ‘Any person at any time may cite to the office in writing prior arts consisting of patents or printed publication which that person believes to have a bearing on the patentability of any claim of a particular patent. If the person explains in writing the pertinency and manner of applying to at least one claim of the patent, the citation of the prior art and the explanation thereof will become part of the official file of the patent.

Zoltan, (2000), prior art and patent infringement.

This relates to the spirit of togetherness which is typical of Africans.

Article 27.1 of the TRIPS Agreement.

Article 27 of the TRIPS Agreement on Patentable Subject Matter.

Suman S. and Prasmi P., (2007), Biopiracy Imitations Not Innovations available at https://ebookbell.com/product/biopiracy-imitations-not-innovations-suman-sahai-prasmi-pavithran-2621786 Accessed on the 14th June 2025.

Article 27.1 of the TRIPS Agreement on Patentable Subject Matter.

The US Second Session of the Inter-Governmental Committee of the Convention on Biological Diversity (June –July 1994).

The WTO is regarded as the most efficient in this regard because its provisions are enforceable through the Dispute Settlement Body.

Article 27.3.b provides that the issue of protection of plant varieties shall be reviewed four years after.

Amos S., (2009), The Protection for Indigenous Traditional Knowledge through the Intellectual Property System and the 2008 South African Intellectual Property law Amendment Bill (Journal of International Commercial Law and Technology, Vol. 4, Issue 3).

WIPO intergovernmental committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore, Seventeenth Session, Geneva 6 to 10 2010 WIPO/GRTKF/IC/17/INF/7.

WIPO Intergovernmental committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore, Sixteenth Session, Geneva May 3 to 7 2010 WIPO/GRTKF/IC/16/6.

WIPO Diplomatic Conference to Conclude on International Legal Instruments Relating to Intellectual Property, Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge Associated with Genetic Resources, Geneva May 13 to 24 2024.

The preamble to the TRIPS Agreement emphasizes that “intellectual property rights are private rights” available to legal person, implying that such rights are generally owned by individuals or corporations, and not by communities, states or nations. See TRIPS Agreement, note 13, Chapter 1, preamble ; also note 217, Chapter 2 at 1.

Marsha A. E. & Echolos, (2003), Geographical Indications for Foods, TRIPS and the Doha Development Agenda in the Journal of African volume 47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021855303002092

Tonina S., (2004), Indigenous Traditional Knowledge and Intellectual Property Rights.

License Terms

Ownership and Licensing:

Authors of research papers submitted to any journal published by The Law Brigade Publishers retain the copyright of their work while granting the journal specific rights. Authors maintain ownership of the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication. Simultaneously, authors agree to license their research papers under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License.

License Permissions:

Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 License, others are permitted to share and adapt the work, even for commercial purposes, provided that appropriate attribution is given to the authors, and acknowledgment is made of the initial publication by The Law Brigade Publishers. This license encourages the broad dissemination and reuse of research papers while ensuring that the original work is properly credited.

Additional Distribution Arrangements:

Authors are free to enter into separate, non-exclusive contractual arrangements for distributing the published version of the work (e.g., posting it to institutional repositories or publishing it in books), provided that the original publication by The Law Brigade Publishers is acknowledged.

Online Posting:

Authors are encouraged to share their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on personal websites) both prior to submission and after publication. This practice can facilitate productive exchanges and increase the visibility and citation of the work.

Responsibility and Liability:

Authors are responsible for ensuring that their submitted research papers do not infringe on the copyright, privacy, or other rights of third parties. The Law Brigade Publishers disclaims any liability for any copyright infringement or violation of third-party rights within the submitted research papers.