A SOCIOLOGICAL STUDY ON THE STATUS OF INFRASTRUCTURE IN PAIKA PANCHAYAT, RANCHI DISTRICT, JHARKHAND, INDIA

Authors

  • Bhawna Nanda 4th Year BA LLB Student, National University of Study and Research in Law, Ranchi Author

Keywords:

Jharkhand, Gram Panchayat, Palika Panchayat

Abstract

Infrastructure is generally defined as the physical framework of facilities through which goods and services are provided to the public. The infrastructure sector covers a wide spectrum of services such as Transportation (including roadways, railways, airways and water transportation), Telecommunication, Water Supply, Sewage Disposal, Irrigation, Medical, Educational and other primary services. Some of these services have a direct impact on the working of a business enterprise, while others are more important from a societal point of view. It contributes to economic development by increasing productivity and by providing amenities that enhance the quality of life. The availability of adequate infrastructure facilities is imperative for the overall economic development of a country. Infrastructure adequacy helps determine success in diversifying production, expanding trade, coping with population growth, reducing poverty and improving environmental conditions. The relationship between each of the infrastructure sectors and the environment is complex. Infrastructure has got both the positive and negative effects on the individuals, society, economy and the natural environment. A good infrastructure in the form of improved transport can increase the productivity of worker through better management of time spent by them on nonproductive activities. Improvements in water supply and sanitation also can have positive impact on the health of the workers, thereby increasing their productivity. A better infrastructure in various forms helps the poor earning more for their livelihood and thus leading to reduction in poverty and inequality.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Asian Development Bank (2008). Managing Asian Cities: Sustainable and inclusive urban

solutions, Asian Development Bank Report, Asian Development Bank, 2008, Publication

Stock No. 050608, ISBN 978-971-561- 698-0.

2. Census 2011, Govt. of India Publication .

3. Cernea, M. M. (1991). Putting people first: sociological variables in rural development (No.

Ed. 2). Oxford University Press for the World Bank.

4. Chatterjee, Partha (1997), `Development Planning and the Indian State', in Terence J. Byres

(ed.), 82_103, The State, Development Planning and Liberalisation in India, Oxford

University Press, Delhi.

5. Dadibhavi, R.V. 1991. Disparities in Social Infrastructural Development in India: 1970-71

to 1984-85. Asian Economic Review, 33(1).

6. Das, Keshab (2001), `Rural Drinking Water Supply in India: Issues and Strategies', 207_277,

in Sebastian Morris (ed.), India Infrastructure Report 2001: Issues in Regulation and Market

Structure, Oxford University Press, New Delhi.

7. Das, Keshab and Leela Visaria (1998), `Issues in Rural Sanitation: Lessons from Gujarat',

Working Paper No. 98, Gujarat Institute of Development Research, Ahmedabad.

8. Dreze, Jean (1990), `Poverty in India and the IRDP Delusion', Economic and Political Weekly,

Vol. 25, No. 39, September, A95-A104.

9. H. Chourabi, N. Taewoo,S. Walker,J. R. Gil-Garcia, S. Mellouli, K. Nahon, T.A. Pardo, H. J.

Scholl (2012). Understanding Smart Cities: An Integrative Framework. System Science

(HICSS), 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference, 4-7 Jan. 2012.

10. Hulten C.R., Bennathan E. and S. Srinivasan .2006. Infrastructure, Externalities, and

Economic Development: A Study of Indian Manufacturing Industry. Mimeo, World Bank.

11. IFPRI, “Agriculture and Rural Development for reducing Poverty and Hunger in Asia”,

www.adb.org/prcm.

12. Jorgenson, D. W. & M. Nishimizu. 1978. U.S. and Japanese Economic Growth, 1952–1974:

An International Comparison. Economic Journal, 88(352), p.p. 707–726.

13. M. N. Srinivas and A. M. Shah (1960). The Myth of Self-Sufficiency of the Indian Village. The

Economic Weekly, 1375- 1378.

14. Mathur, L. (2009). Silent but successful initiative. The Hindu, 1st March, 2009.

15. Mera, K. 1975. Income Distribution and Regional Development, University of Tokyo Press.

16. Patel, N. 2005. Evaluating the role of primary health centers in India. Healthcare Management,

16th -31st August

17. Pendley, Charles (1997), `A Demand-based Approach to Rural Water Supply and Sanitation',

in K. Pushpangadan (ed.), National Seminar on Rural Water Supply and Sanitation, Centre for

Development Studies, Trivandrum.

18. R. Heeks, (2002). Information Systems and Developing Countries: Failure, Success, and Local

Improvisations. The Information Society, 18 (2) pp 101-112.

19. S. Daniel, M. A. Doran (2013). Geo Smart City: Geomatics Contribution to the Smart City, In:

The 14th ACM Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, Pp. 65-71.

20. Sen, Siddhartha (1999b), Global Consultation on Safe Water and Sanitation for the 1990s:

Background Paper, Government of India, New Delhi.

21. Shah, Narottam. 1970. Overall Summary: Infrastructure for the Indian Economy. In Dagli,

Vadilal (ed.) Infrastructure for the Indian Economy.

22. Sivasubramonian, S. 2004. The Sources of Economic Growth in India 1950-1 to 1999-2000.

Oxford. New Delhi.

23. Straub, S. 2008. Infrastructure and Development: A Critical Appraisal of the Macro Level

Literature. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. WPS4590.

24. Tewari, R.T.1984. Economic Infrastructure and Regional Development in India. Man and

Development, 6(4).

25. Visaria, P. 1998. Workforce and employment in India, 1961-1994. Mimeo, International

Association of Income and wealth, Government of India.

Downloads

Published

13-07-2018

How to Cite

A SOCIOLOGICAL STUDY ON THE STATUS OF INFRASTRUCTURE IN PAIKA PANCHAYAT, RANCHI DISTRICT, JHARKHAND, INDIA. (2018). Asia Pacific Law & Policy Review, 4, 68-107. https://journal.thelawbrigade.com/aplpr/article/view/145