SUPREME COURT ON DEATH PENALTY

Authors

  • Dr. Suman Yadav Assistant Professor Author
  • Amol Shetty 3rd Year BBA LLB Student, UWSL, Gandhinagar Author

Downloads

Abstract

The below article deals purely with the reliance on constitutional aspect of Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in delivering the judgments relating to cases challenging the constitutionality of death penalty in various cases and tries to answer the long debated question whether the death penalty in India must be retained or abolished? The Indian courts constantly face with the situation where they are required to answer to new challenges and mould the sentencing system to meet those challenges. Protection of society and deterring the criminal is the avowed object of law and that is required to be achieved by imposing appropriate sentence. The change in the legislative intendment relating to award of capital punishment notwithstanding, the opposition by the protagonist of abolition of capital sentence, shows that it is expected of the courts to so operate the sentencing system as to impose such sentence which reflects the social conscience of the society. The sentencing process has to be stern where it should be this is what the Indian Judicial System is trying to say every time it has delivered a judgment on death penalty.

Readership Data

🌐

Refreshing Cached Analytics Data

The cached analytics data has become stale and journal.thelawbrigade.com is making a fresh request to fetch the latest data from Google Analytics. This may take 20-30 seconds depending on the server response time from Google Analytics. Please do not close the browser during this time. We appreciate your patience.

Published

16-08-2017

License

Copyright © 2026 by Dr. Suman Yadav, Amol Shetty

The copyright and license terms mentioned on this page take precedence over any other license terms mentioned on the article full text PDF or any other material associated with the article.

How to Cite

Dr. Suman Yadav, and Amol Shetty. “SUPREME COURT ON DEATH PENALTY ”. Journal of Legal Studies & Research, vol. 3, no. 4, Aug. 2017, pp. 38-47, https://journal.thelawbrigade.com/jlsr/article/view/2002.