SEDITION VS. FREEDOM OF SPEECH: NAVIGATING THE NEXUS WITH NATIONAL SECURITY

Authors

  • L Raghavi 2nd Year BCOM LLB Student, Ramaiah College of Law, Bangalore, India Author

Downloads

Abstract

The constitutionality of Section 124A of IPC came under scrutiny in the landmark case of S.G. Vombatkere v. Union of India [(2022) 7 SCC 433], presented before the esteemed Supreme Court. The Union of India, acknowledging a reevaluation of Section 124A, urged the Court not to expend its valuable time on the matter. In response, on 11th May 2022, the Supreme Court directed both the Central Government and State Governments to suspend the registration of new FIRs and coercive actions related to Section 124A. This directive extended to the suspension of ongoing investigations, as well as the temporary halt of pending trials, appeals, and proceedings associated with the section. This paper critically examines the concept of sedition and delves into its constitutional validity, contextualized by insights from the 22nd law commission report, offering an insightful analysis of the intricate nexus between freedom of speech and national security.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

22-08-2023

License

Copyright © 2025 by L Raghavi

The copyright and license terms mentioned on this page take precedence over any other license terms mentioned on the article full text PDF or any other material associated with the article.

How to Cite

L Raghavi. “SEDITION VS. FREEDOM OF SPEECH: NAVIGATING THE NEXUS WITH NATIONAL SECURITY”. Journal of Legal Studies & Research, vol. 9, no. 4, Aug. 2023, pp. 149-64, https://journal.thelawbrigade.com/jlsr/article/view/1700.