ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN HUMAN RIGHTS

Authors

  • Parth Raman 4th Year BA LLB (Hons) Student, University Institute of Legal Studies, Chandigarh University, India Author

Downloads

Abstract

The likelihood that the legal system will serve as the primary forum for dispute resolution is eroding. Procedures for alternative dispute resolution (ADR) will often proliferate and formalise. These techniques include ADR based on causing notice and ADR based on agreements (such as appeasement and intercession) (like intervention). Inquiringly, despite these developments, two important ADR and appropriate compromise problems continue to be murky in international human rights law (IHRL). The primary focus of the inquiry is on the equity standards anticipated by ADR/PDR (whether entered deliberately or compulsorily). The crucial component is the legal requirements that can require parties to a dispute to use ADR/PDR instead of, or in conjunction with, going to court.

Readership Data

🌐

Refreshing Cached Analytics Data

The cached analytics data has become stale and journal.thelawbrigade.com is making a fresh request to fetch the latest data from Google Analytics. This may take 20-30 seconds depending on the server response time from Google Analytics. Please do not close the browser during this time. We appreciate your patience.

Published

02-10-2022

License

Copyright © 2026 by Parth Raman

The copyright and license terms mentioned on this page take precedence over any other license terms mentioned on the article full text PDF or any other material associated with the article.

How to Cite

Raman, Parth. “ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN HUMAN RIGHTS”. Journal of Alternate Dispute Resolution, vol. 1, no. 1, Oct. 2022, pp. 29-35, https://journal.thelawbrigade.com/jadr/article/view/949.