EXPECTATION DAMAGES RULE UNDER AMERICAN CONTRACT LAW

Authors

  • Zhihong Dai 2th Year LLM Student, Guangdong University of Foreign Study Author

Downloads

Abstract

Under American contract law, the most common used basis for calculation of damages is expectation damages rule when there is a breach of contract. The rule was finalized in Robinson v Harman. The rule is now reflected in Uniform Commercial Code and the restatement (second) of contract. It is still the most common principal of calculating damages used by court. After a century’s development, the rule had developed three restrictions, which are foreseeability restrictions, mitigation liability and certainty restriction. Under common law, the most common remedy for breach of contract is monetary damages rather than specific performance, which is different from civil law. The purpose of monetary damages is to provide the aggrieved party compensation.

Readership Data

−
🌐

Refreshing Cached Analytics Data

The cached analytics data has become stale and journal.thelawbrigade.com is making a fresh request to fetch the latest data from Google Analytics. This may take 20-30 seconds depending on the server response time from Google Analytics. Please do not close the browser during this time. We appreciate your patience.

Published

28-01-2020

License

Copyright © 2026 by Zhihong Dai

The copyright and license terms mentioned on this page take precedence over any other license terms mentioned on the article full text PDF or any other material associated with the article.

How to Cite

Dai, Zhihong. “EXPECTATION DAMAGES RULE UNDER AMERICAN CONTRACT LAW”. Indian Politics & Law Review Journal, vol. 5, Jan. 2020, pp. 45-53, https://journal.thelawbrigade.com/iplr/article/view/664.