THE PRINCIPLE OF RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT: THE CASE OF ROHINGYA IN MYANMAR

Authors

  • Dr S Krishnan Mani Assistant Professor, Seedling School of Law and Governance, Jaipur National University, Jaipur Author
  • Mr. Aniruddha V. Babar Assistant Professor, Seedling School of Law and Governance, Jaipur National University, Jaipur Author

Downloads

Keywords:

Responsibility to Protect, Ethnic minorities, Genocide

Abstract

The issue of Rohingya Muslims of Myanmar is not only an ethnic but religious issue as well. The Rohingya are Myanmar’s Muslim minority who reside in the northern parts of the Rakhine region(historically known as Arakan), a geographically isolated area in western Myanmar, bordering Bangladesh. The ethno-religious clashes between Buddhist population and Rohingya Muslims draw the attention of the world to the relatively insignificant country- The Myanmar. The paper argues that the Rohingya is facing a serious threat of genocide, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity, while the government of Myanmar has failed in its primary duty to protect them. Due to such failure, the responsibility to protect them falls on the international community to prevent the occurrence of mass atrocities under the principle of Responsibility to Protect (R2P). The objectives of this article are two-fold. First is to provide an understanding of the plight of the Rohingya and second is to analyse the application of R2P as a solution to the crisis.

Readership Data

🌐

Refreshing Cached Analytics Data

The cached analytics data has become stale and journal.thelawbrigade.com is making a fresh request to fetch the latest data from Google Analytics. This may take 20-30 seconds depending on the server response time from Google Analytics. Please do not close the browser during this time. We appreciate your patience.

Published

07-06-2018

License

Copyright © 2026 by Dr S Krishnan Mani, Mr. Aniruddha V. Babar

The copyright and license terms mentioned on this page take precedence over any other license terms mentioned on the article full text PDF or any other material associated with the article.

How to Cite

Mani, Dr S Krishnan, and Mr. Aniruddha V. Babar. “THE PRINCIPLE OF RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT: THE CASE OF ROHINGYA IN MYANMAR”. Commonwealth Law Review Journal, vol. 4, June 2018, pp. 279-02, https://journal.thelawbrigade.com/clrj/article/view/339.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 63

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.