RIGHT TO FREEDOM FROM TORTURE: HAS INDIA COMPLIED WITH ITS INTERNATIONAL OBLIGATIONS?
Keywords:
RIGHT TO FREEDOM, TORTURE, AFSPAAbstract
The will of the international community regarding human dignity, worth and respect and fundamental freedoms is well reflected in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (“UDHR”), “mother” document of all the different human rights instruments that are currently in place, in the post-World War II era. Prohibition against torture, by virtue of being a jus cogens norm, is placed on a very high pedestal and hence, it is the responsibility of all States to curb any practice of torture against their citizens. Article 5 of the UDHR specifies that no person shall be subjected to any kind of cruel degrading or inhumane treatment or torture or punishment.1 Its recognition is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world. Torture, which is defined in the United Nations Convention Against Torture, and Other Cruel, Inhumane or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (“UNCAT”), envisages a complete prohibition on torture or cruel, degrading and inhumane treatment.2Although customary international law and major conventions have called for a complete prohibition against torture many State Parties have violated their obligation to prevent torture and protect its individuals from cruel, inhumane and degrading treatment. In this paper, the authors examine the obligations India has to prohibit and prevent torture in all its forms. It has these obligations by virtue of being a State Party and State Signatory to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1966 (“ICCPR”) and UNCAT respectively.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License Terms
Ownership and Licensing:
Authors of research papers submitted to any journal published by The Law Brigade Publishers retain the copyright of their work while granting the journal specific rights. Authors maintain ownership of the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication. Simultaneously, authors agree to license their research papers under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License.
License Permissions:
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 License, others are permitted to share and adapt the work, even for commercial purposes, provided that appropriate attribution is given to the authors, and acknowledgment is made of the initial publication by The Law Brigade Publishers. This license encourages the broad dissemination and reuse of research papers while ensuring that the original work is properly credited.
Additional Distribution Arrangements:
Authors are free to enter into separate, non-exclusive contractual arrangements for distributing the published version of the work (e.g., posting it to institutional repositories or publishing it in books), provided that the original publication by The Law Brigade Publishers is acknowledged.
Online Posting:
Authors are encouraged to share their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on personal websites) both prior to submission and after publication. This practice can facilitate productive exchanges and increase the visibility and citation of the work.
Responsibility and Liability:
Authors are responsible for ensuring that their submitted research papers do not infringe on the copyright, privacy, or other rights of third parties. The Law Brigade Publishers disclaims any liability for any copyright infringement or violation of third-party rights within the submitted research papers.