COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF JURISPRUDENTIAL SCHOOLS WITH REFERENCE TO ARUNA SHANBAUG CASE

Authors

  • Niki Shah B.Com LLB Student, Institute of Law, Nirma University Author

Keywords:

Euthanasia, Jurisprudence, India

Abstract

The present research paper compares and contrasts various jurisprudential schools in the light of the case Aruna Shanbaug v Union of India in which the court dealt with the largely debated issue of Euthanasia. Through this comparative analysis, we understand how Jurists take different approaches in order to define what law is and how it should be. Depending on their approaches towards the nature of law and justice, the Jurists are classified under different schools of thought. The schools that will be compared with reference to this case are Natural school, Positive school, Historical School and the sociological school.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

07-07-2018

How to Cite

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF JURISPRUDENTIAL SCHOOLS WITH REFERENCE TO ARUNA SHANBAUG CASE. (2018). Asia Pacific Law & Policy Review, 4, 264-271. https://journal.thelawbrigade.com/aplpr/article/view/172

Similar Articles

1-10 of 86

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.