SUPREME COURT ADVOCATES-ON- RECORD ASSOCIATION & ANR. v. UNION OF INDIA

Authors

  • Nidhi Singh 5th Year, BA LLB, National University of Advanced Legal Studies, Kochi Author

Downloads

Abstract

The case of Supreme Court Advocates-on- Record Association & Anr. v. Union of India, was a 2014 judgement of the Supreme Court of India, which dealt with the 99th amendment to the Indian Constitution. In its 1042 page judgement, the court declared the Constitution (Ninetyninth Amendment) Act, 2014 (hereinafter referred to as, the Constitution (99th Amendment) Act), and the National Judicial Appointments Commission Act, 2014 (hereinafter referred to as, the NJAC Act) as unconstitutional. This paper seeks to rebut the three main issues bought forth in the judgement. 

Article 368 of the Indian Constitution lays down the power of the parliament to amend the Constitution and the procedure therefor to do the same. The Indian Constitution provides a very easy and simple procedure to amend the Constitution under Article 368, reflecting the Constitution's partly rigid-partly flexible character. The provision has been put to use over 100 times. 

The amending mechanism was lauded even at the time of introduction of the Constitution by 

Dr. Ambedkar in the following words ‘We can therefore safely say that the Indian federation will not suffer from the faults of rigidity or legalism. Its distinguished feature is that it is a flexible federation. 

Published

04-10-2016

License

Copyright © 2026 by Nidhi Singh

The copyright and license terms mentioned on this page take precedence over any other license terms mentioned on the article full text PDF or any other material associated with the article.

How to Cite

Nidhi Singh. “SUPREME COURT ADVOCATES-ON- RECORD ASSOCIATION & ANR. V. UNION OF INDIA ”. Journal of Legal Studies & Research, vol. 2, no. 5, Oct. 2016, pp. 119-31, https://journal.thelawbrigade.com/jlsr/article/view/2686.