RESIDENTS OF INDIA’S NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI DESERVE A STRONGER ANTI-CORRUPTION OMBUDSMAN LEGISLATION

Authors

  • Ajitesh Kir Advocate, High Court of Delhi Author

Downloads

Abstract

Much has been written and opined, by both scholars and political commentators, on the famous 2011 campaign led by Anna Hazare which eventually led to the enactment of the anticorruption ombudsman legislation i.e. The Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013 (Act 1 of 2014). Strangely, the ombudsman legislation operating in the National Capital Territory of Delhi, the hotbed and centre stage of the aforesaid campaign, has invited little scholarly attention. The present article seeks to fill that vacuum insofar as a critical analysis of The Delhi Lokayukta and Upalokayukta Act, 1995 (Act 1 of 1996) is concerned.  

 

Since The Delhi Janlokpal Bill, 2015 is yet to receive the assent of the Lt. Governor, the people of Delhi continue to rely on the Lokayukta for redressal of grievances qua maladministration and corruption. Unfortunately, the Delhi Ombudman is neither efficacious nor fully independent as duly noted recently by the High Court of Delhi. 

Published

01-10-2016

License

Copyright © 2026 by Ajitesh Kir

The copyright and license terms mentioned on this page take precedence over any other license terms mentioned on the article full text PDF or any other material associated with the article.

How to Cite

Ajitesh Kir. “RESIDENTS OF INDIA’S NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI DESERVE A STRONGER ANTI-CORRUPTION OMBUDSMAN LEGISLATION ”. Journal of Legal Studies & Research, vol. 2, no. 5, Oct. 2016, pp. 12-40, https://journal.thelawbrigade.com/jlsr/article/view/2679.