THE FAROOQUI VERDICT: EXPLORING JUDICIAL NOTION, RAPE MYTHS & CONFUSING CONSENT

Authors

  • Akash Bag Research Scholar, Amity Law School, Amity University, Raipur, India Author
  • Shobha Singh Thakur Assistant Professor, Kalinga University, Raipur, India Author
  • Abhijeet Kumar Singh 4th Year BBA LLB Student, Kalinga University, Raipur, India Author

Downloads

Abstract

A criminal trial is constructed around various narratives put forward by the prosecution and the defence, which then crystallize in the narrative established by the judgment. All these narratives rely on background narrative scripts and cultural assumptions that provide stock character roles and interpretations. This paper examines the High Court’s and the Supreme Court’s treatment of the high-profile Mahmood Farooqui rape case to illustrate how prevalent rape myths inform judicial discourse in rape cases and color the judicial narrative reconstruction of events. Both appellate courts operate in the discursive register typically used by the defence in rape trials, where the facts of the case are presented in a manner that portrays the complainant as active and the accused as passive while also evoking tropes of male rationality and female irrationality in the performance of consent, communication, and desire. These grammatical and rhetorical techniques are employed concerning the prior interaction between the complainant and accused and to the complainant’s post facto conduct. Together, these elements reproduce the mythical constructs of ‘real’ rape and the ‘bad’ rape victim.

Published

14-08-2021

License

Copyright © 2026 by Akash Bag, Shobha Singh Thakur, Abhijeet Kumar Singh

The copyright and license terms mentioned on this page take precedence over any other license terms mentioned on the article full text PDF or any other material associated with the article.

How to Cite

Akash Bag, et al. “THE FAROOQUI VERDICT: EXPLORING JUDICIAL NOTION, RAPE MYTHS & CONFUSING CONSENT”. Journal of Legal Studies & Research, vol. 7, no. 4, Aug. 2021, pp. 63-86, https://journal.thelawbrigade.com/jlsr/article/view/2607.