CASE COMMENT: JOSEPH SHINE v. UNION OF INDIA

Authors

  • Surbhi Burman 3rd Year, BBA-LLB (H) Student, Vivekananda Institute of Professional Studies Author
  • Smriti Walia 3rd Year, BBA-LLB (H) Student, Vivekananda Institute of Professional Studies Author

Downloads

Abstract

Case No. W.P. (Criminal) No. 194 of 2017, (Decided on September 27, 2018)

The decision in Joseph Shine v. Union of India received wide public acclaim along with a torrent of pointed and popular attack as the offence of adultery was struck down as a criminal offence. A myopic and categorical approach towards the gender biased provision of Section 497 of the Indian Penal Code ushered the Court in an unpromising direction. A standoff between particularity and predictability was evident as was the hesitation of the Court to take the road less travelled. 

While the foundational premise of Joseph Shine was to uphold equality, liberty, dignity and privacy as supreme Constitutional values, the overarching effect of their application, simmers down the significance of the judgment. Though it explicitly placed heavy reliance on the need of recognising women to be their own persons, the inadvertent outlook of the Court comes across as crass and contradictory.

In making a verdict on maintaining the sanctity of matrimonial homes, an overly sanitised perspective only created a murkier position. The precedent sounds the death knell for the failure of the promise to fulfil Constitutional commitments. The Comment goes on to discuss the scope and interpretational principles of this case. 

Adultery is a legal quandary which contains elements of biblical cadence in it. The provision criminalises sexual intercourse with a married woman and exclusively punishes only the man for such an act. It enfolds within itself a mirage of sanctuary, solely for women, from criminal prosecution. To remove the ripples of illusive protection, the constitutionality of the same was challenged.

Into this gulf came Joseph Shine v. Union of India, wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India laid the judicial debate to rest by striking down Section 497 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as the “IPC”) along with Section 198(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the “CrPC”). It teed up like no other case the questions of Constitutional interpretation in a doctrinal abyss. 

Published

20-01-2019

License

Copyright © 2026 by Surbhi Burman, Smriti Walia

The copyright and license terms mentioned on this page take precedence over any other license terms mentioned on the article full text PDF or any other material associated with the article.

How to Cite

Surbhi Burman, and Smriti Walia. “CASE COMMENT: JOSEPH SHINE V. UNION OF INDIA”. Journal of Legal Studies & Research, vol. 5, no. 1, Jan. 2019, pp. 182-5, https://journal.thelawbrigade.com/jlsr/article/view/2299.