ARBITRATING MATRIMONIAL DISPUTES IN INDIA

Authors

  • Prarthana Chigateri 4th Year B.A. L.L.B Student, O.P. Jindal Global University Author

Downloads

Abstract

As the name suggests, matrimonial arbitrations deal with matrimonial disputes like divorce, separation, restitution, custody etc., and such disputes could have arisen before or after a divorce. When both spouses agree to submit to arbitration, the decision or award of the arbitrator becomes final and binding, and the parties are bound to obey it. Parties often draw out elaborate arbitration agreements indicating their willingness to arbitrate, incase of a dispute, and the agreement includes among other things, the name of the arbitrator, powers of the arbitrator, and the dispute referred to arbitration. In India, matrimonial disputes are not arbitrable. In Booz Allen and Hamilton Vs. SBI Home Finance Limited and others, the Supreme Court laid down the scope of arbitrable issues. The Court noted that matrimonial disputes relating to divorce, judicial separation, restitution of conjugal rights and child custody are non-arbitrable. 

This article will provide a comparative perspective of matrimonial arbitrations. The first part will discuss matrimonial arbitrations in India. The second part will discuss the matrimonial arbitration laws of three other countries i.e. United Kingdom, the United States of America, and Australia. The third part will discuss the advantages and the disadvantages of matrimonial arbitrations. The fourth and concluding part will evaluate the scope of matrimonial arbitrations, and will propose a workable solution for the arbitration of matrimonial disputes in India. 

Published

01-10-2018

License

Copyright © 2026 by Prarthana Chigateri

The copyright and license terms mentioned on this page take precedence over any other license terms mentioned on the article full text PDF or any other material associated with the article.

How to Cite

Prarthana Chigateri. “ARBITRATING MATRIMONIAL DISPUTES IN INDIA”. Journal of Legal Studies & Research, vol. 4, no. 5, Oct. 2018, pp. 140-8, https://journal.thelawbrigade.com/jlsr/article/view/2249.