JUSTIFYING Jurisprudence Constante AS INTERPRETATIVE INSTRUMENT OF INVESTMENT TREATY ARBITRATION

Authors

  • Thanapat Chatinakrob LLM Student, Queen Mary, University of London; LLM and LLB (Thammasat) Author

Downloads

Abstract

In general, the parties to any dispute settlement mechanism might predict a tentative outcome from stare decisis, which is the principle of precedent in the common law system that the Tribunal stands by its former decisions. However, not every judicial system shares the same notion, especially investment arbitration, such as the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (“ICSID”) tribunal that manifestly refuses such a principle. It draws an attraction on the possibility to apply precedent decisions as an interpretative instrument. This comes to a question on to what extent prior awards have persuasive effect in investment arbitration.

Readership Data

🌐

Refreshing Cached Analytics Data

The cached analytics data has become stale and journal.thelawbrigade.com is making a fresh request to fetch the latest data from Google Analytics. This may take 20-30 seconds depending on the server response time from Google Analytics. Please do not close the browser during this time. We appreciate your patience.

Published

18-04-2018

License

Copyright © 2026 by Thanapat Chatinakrob

The copyright and license terms mentioned on this page take precedence over any other license terms mentioned on the article full text PDF or any other material associated with the article.

How to Cite

Thanapat Chatinakrob. “JUSTIFYING Jurisprudence Constante AS INTERPRETATIVE INSTRUMENT OF INVESTMENT TREATY ARBITRATION”. Journal of Legal Studies & Research, vol. 4, no. 2, Apr. 2018, pp. 188-9, https://journal.thelawbrigade.com/jlsr/article/view/2126.