COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PLEA BARGAINING PROCEDURE IN INDIAN, AMERICAN & ITALIAN JURISDICTIONS

Authors

  • Rishabh Sharma 2nd Year BA LLB Student, National Academy of Legal Studies and Research (NALSAR) University of Law, Hyderabad. Author

Downloads

Abstract

Over the world, plea bargaining mechanism has been rapidly gaining traction in resolution of legal disputes. The applicability, scope, and operation of plea bargaining is manifestly distinct in common law and civil law countries. To critically examine these distinctions in reference to different jurisdictions, a comparative evaluation of India, United States of America, and Italy has been undertaken in this research. The extent to which plea bargaining is more beneficial than disadvantageous is contentious. This is because the practice of plea bargaining is argued to challenge the very premise of a trial; which is to unearth truth and dispense justice. The fact of requirement of an instantaneous justice administration framework in India is beyond contestation. This researcher endeavors to ascertain whether plea bargaining in India in its present form and structure is sufficient to achieve that object, by contrasting its advantages and disadvantages in the context of the Indian judicial system, and later, proposing reforms in the sphere of this modern dispute resolution mechanism. 

Published

02-10-2017

License

Copyright © 2026 by Rishabh Sharma

The copyright and license terms mentioned on this page take precedence over any other license terms mentioned on the article full text PDF or any other material associated with the article.

How to Cite

Rishabh Sharma. “COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PLEA BARGAINING PROCEDURE IN INDIAN, AMERICAN & ITALIAN JURISDICTIONS”. Journal of Legal Studies & Research, vol. 3, no. 5, Oct. 2017, pp. 121-39, https://journal.thelawbrigade.com/jlsr/article/view/2025.