REVISITING V. TULASAMMA AND ORS. VS SESHA REDDY (DEAD) BY LRS.: AN OVERVIEW AND SOCIAL ANALYSIS

Authors

  • Suhani Dube 2nd Year LLB Hons Student, Jindal Global Law School, Sonipat, India Author
  • Dhruv Kaushik 2nd Year LLB Hons Student, Jindal Global Law School, Sonipat, India Author

Downloads

Abstract

(i) Where property is given to a Hindu female in lieu of maintenance under an instrument and the instrument restricts the nature of the interest given to her in the property. In such a situation, it must be determined whether it is sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) of Section 14 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 that applies. In brief, the issue is to decide whether in the situation, the appellant will receive the said property as a limited estate or as her absolute property.

If sub-section (1) applies, then the limitations on the nature of her interest are wiped out and she becomes the full owner of the property. On the other hand, if sub-section (2) governs such a case, her limited interest in the property is not enlarged and she continues to have the restricted estate prescribed by the instrument. 

Readership Data

−
🌐

Refreshing Cached Analytics Data

The cached analytics data has become stale and journal.thelawbrigade.com is making a fresh request to fetch the latest data from Google Analytics. This may take 20-30 seconds depending on the server response time from Google Analytics. Please do not close the browser during this time. We appreciate your patience.

Published

13-06-2022

License

Copyright © 2026 by Suhani Dube, Dhruv Kaushik

The copyright and license terms mentioned on this page take precedence over any other license terms mentioned on the article full text PDF or any other material associated with the article.

How to Cite

Suhani Dube, and Dhruv Kaushik. “REVISITING V. TULASAMMA AND ORS. VS SESHA REDDY (DEAD) BY LRS.: AN OVERVIEW AND SOCIAL ANALYSIS”. Journal of Legal Studies & Research, vol. 8, no. 3, June 2022, pp. 198-0, https://journal.thelawbrigade.com/jlsr/article/view/1381.