THE PLIGHT OF WOMEN’S HUMAN RIGHT IN INDIA: AN ANALYSIS OF THE STATUS QUO
Keywords:
Gender discrimination, Patriarchal norms, transformative, constitutionalismAbstract
Despite being considered the epitome of goddess in religious literature, the reality of a woman in the Indian society is paradoxical. They start facing discrimination as soon as they enter this patriarchal world. When they are in a mother’s womb, they face discrimination in the form of female foeticide. When young, she faces this disparity in the shape of female genital mutilation, child marriage and this disparity continues in her day to day life as she grows older but takes other forms such as honour killings, etc. This continues even when she gets married of which marital rape, domestic violence, dowry deaths are express manifestation of this gender-based discrimination. The main reason behind this inequality experienced by woman is the patriarchal norms prevalent in the Indian society which seeks to control women’s sexuality in order to oppress and subjugate them. The present paper ventures to discuss the scope of these problems and the way, these practices are justified in the name of culture and religion by the cultural relativists. It describes the legal framework designed to eradicate all forms of discrimination against this weaker section of society. It forecasts the responsive job performed by the judiciary in the public sphere, however, disregards its role in the empowerment of women on religious grounds. Thus, the paper advocates for observance of principles of transformative constitutionalism by the judiciary in order to realise the aim of “gender equality” and recommends for sensitisation of all public authorities along with social institutions like the family, institution of religion and educational institutions.
Downloads
References
iGoal 5: Gender Equality, UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT
PROGRAMME,https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/sustainable-development-goals/goal-5-genderequality.html.
iiId.
iiiJonathan Woetzel et al., The power of parity: Advancing women’s equality in India, 2018, MCKINSEY &
ivThe Vienna Declaration, art. 5 (1993).
vWhat is Cultural Relativism?,WORLDATLAS,https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/what-is-culturalrelativism.html.
viSUSAN DELLER ROSS, WOMEN’S HUMAN RIGHTS: THE INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE LAW CASE-BOOK
461(2008).
viiAmerican Anthropological Association, Statement on Human Rights by the Executive Board, 49 AMERICAN
ANTH., 539 (1947).
viiiGayatri Patel, How ‘Universal’ is the United Nation’s Universal Periodic Review Process? An Examination of
the Discussions held on Polygamy, 18 HUMAN RIGHTS REV., 459-483 (2017).
ixSandra Danial, Cultural Relativism v. Universalism: Female Genital Mutilation, Pragmatic Remedies, 2 J. OF
HIS. STUD., 4 (2013).
xKate Norman, et al., FGM is always with us: Experiences, Perceptions and Beliefs of Women affected by Female
Genital Mutilation in London, Results from Peer Study,
https://options.co.uk/sites/default/files/uk_2009_female_genital_mutilation.pdf.
xiWorld Health Organization, Female Genital Mutilation: A Joint WHO/UNICEF/UNFPA Statement,
BFD84BAF1796?sequence=1.
xii V.P. Bhandaram, Maneka Gandhi, are you saying men can rape their wives as long as some ‘family values’ are
intact?, FIRSTPOST (Mar. 13, 2016, 11: 08 AM), https://www.firstpost.com/india/maneka-gandhi-are-you-sayingmen-can-rape-their-wives-as-long-as-the-family-values-are-intact-2671754.html.
xiiiGayatri Patel, supra note at 8.
xivARATI RAO, THE POLITICS OF GENDER AND CULTURE IN INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS DISCOURSE IN J.S.
PETERS & ANDREA WOLPER, WOMEN RIGHTS, HUMAN RIGHTS: INTERNATIONAL FEMINIST PERSPECTIVES 169 (1st
ed. 1995).
xvWorld Health Organization,supra note at 12.
xviFemale Genital Mutilation: Guide to Eliminating the FGM Practice in India,
xvii World Health Organisation, supra note at 12.
xviiiBryna Hallam, Ban welcomes UN General Assembly resolutions eliminating female genital mutilation, UN
NEWS (Dec. 21, 2012),https://news.un.org/en/story/2012/12/429012-ban-welcomes-un-general-assemblyresolutions-eliminating-female-genital.
xixSTACY L. MALLICOAT& CONNIE ESTRADA IRELAND, WOMEN AND CRIME: THE ESSENTIALS 139 (1st ed. 2013).
xxPalash R. Ghosh, Caste-Council ‘explains’ Honor-Killings, while India still reels from gang-rape tragedy,
SHAKTI VAHINI (Jan 17, 2013),https://shaktivahini.org/caste-council-explains-honor-killings-while-india-stillreels-from-gang-rape-tragedy/.
xxiShakti Vahini v. Union of India, (2018) 7 SCC 192.
xxii 1 Sir Mathew Hale, History of the Pleas of the Crown 629 (1736).
xxiii The Indian Penal Code, § 375 (1860).
xxivState v. Ranjit Singh;SeeCourt verdict on forced sex in marriage a manifestation of patriarchal mindset, says
NFIW, THE HINDU (May 14, 2014),https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Delhi/court-verdict-on-forced-sex-inmarriage-a-manifestation-of-patriarchal-mindset-says-nfiw/article6007945.ece.
xxvNational Crimes Record Bureau, Crime in India, 2018, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS,
http://ncrb.gov.in/StatPublications/CII/CII2018/pdfs/Crime%20in%20India%202018%20-
%20Volume%201.pdf.
xxviId.
xxviiJohn Van Willigen& V. Channa, Law, Custom and Crimes against Women: The Problem of Dowry Death in
India, 50(4) HUMAN ORG., 369-377 (1991).
xxviiiPawan Mittal & S.K. Dhattarwal, Vitriolage: The Curse of Human Origin, 6(21) MED. SCI., 61-64 (2014).
xxixSitalKalantry& Jocelyn G. Kestenbaum, Combating Acid Violence in Bangladesh, India and Cambodia, AVON
FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN, 1-64 (2014)
xxxRashida Manjoo, Mission to India: Human Rights Council, Report of the United Nations Special Rapporteur
on Violence Against Women its Causes and Consequences (Apr., 2014), http://www.ohchr.org/EN
xxxiManjoo, supra note 31.
xxxiiLaw Commission of India, 226 Report on The Inclusion of Acid Attacks as Specific Offences in the Indian
Penal Code and a law for Compensation for Victims of Crime (July, 2009).
xxxiii (2010) 10 SCC 469.
xxxiv2018 (4) JKJ 22 [SC]
xxxvAIR 2010 SC 965
xxxviAIR 2006 SC 2522
xxxvii2015 (2) SC ALE 223
xxxviiiAIR 1984 Del 66.
xxxixTukaram v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 1979 SC 185.
xlAIR 1983 SC 753 288.
xliVisakha v. State of Rajasthan, (1997) 6 SCC 241.
xliiAIR 2008 SC 663.
xliiiKarl Klare, Legal Culture and Transformative Constitutionalism, South African J. of Hum. Rig. 146 (1998).
xlivOSCAR VILHENA, et al., TRANSFORMATIVE CONSTITUTIONALISM: COMPARING THE APEX COURTS OF BRAZIL,
INDIA AND SOUTH AFRICA (2013).
xlvAkhil BharatiyaSoshitKaramchari Sangh v. Union of India, 1981 SCC (1) 246.
xlviJustice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India, AIR 2017 SC 4161.
xlviiShafin Jahan v. Asokan K.M. &Ors., 2018 SCC Online SC 343.
xlviiiShayaraBano v. Union of India, (2016) 2 SCC 445.
xlixState of Bombay v. NarasuAppa Mali, AIR 1952 Bom 84.
l
Indian Young Lawyers Association &Ors. v. The State of Kerala, 2018 SCC OnLine SC 1690.
li Goolrokh M. Gupta v. BurjorPardiwala President &Ors., 2013 (2) RCR (Civil) 91.
liiJoseph Shine v. Union of India, AIR 2018 SC 4898.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License Terms
Ownership and Licensing:
Authors of research papers submitted to any journal published by The Law Brigade Publishers retain the copyright of their work while granting the journal specific rights. Authors maintain ownership of the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication. Simultaneously, authors agree to license their research papers under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License.
License Permissions:
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 License, others are permitted to share and adapt the work, even for commercial purposes, provided that appropriate attribution is given to the authors, and acknowledgment is made of the initial publication by The Law Brigade Publishers. This license encourages the broad dissemination and reuse of research papers while ensuring that the original work is properly credited.
Additional Distribution Arrangements:
Authors are free to enter into separate, non-exclusive contractual arrangements for distributing the published version of the work (e.g., posting it to institutional repositories or publishing it in books), provided that the original publication by The Law Brigade Publishers is acknowledged.
Online Posting:
Authors are encouraged to share their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on personal websites) both prior to submission and after publication. This practice can facilitate productive exchanges and increase the visibility and citation of the work.
Responsibility and Liability:
Authors are responsible for ensuring that their submitted research papers do not infringe on the copyright, privacy, or other rights of third parties. The Law Brigade Publishers disclaims any liability for any copyright infringement or violation of third-party rights within the submitted research papers.