A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ADOPTION & DOMICILE IN CANADA, INDIA, USA AND UK
Keywords:
Adoption, Domicile, Canada, USA, IndiaAbstract
Before the dawn of legal revolution, Adoption initially was neither a legal right nor a God-given right to any person. History dating back as early to the Roman Empire speaks volumes on Adoption and the inherent economic and political interests of the adopter. The practice of Adoption in ancient Rome is well documented in Codex Justinianus (a.k.a. The Code of Justinian). For instance, the use of Adoption by the Aristocracy in Roman Empire is well documented where many of Rome’s Emperors were adopted sons. Markedly different from the modern period, ancient Adoption was a double standard strategy used by the adopter to strengthen political ties between wealthy families to create male heirs to manage big estates. The Code of Hammurabi details the rights of adopters and the responsibilities of adopted individuals at length. Other ancient civilizations, notably India and China, used some form of adoption but in a very restricted sense that too depending on exigencies and grave circumstances. With the gradual marching of time, the modern form of adoption emerged in the United States of America (USA) when the ‘Baby Scoop Era’ (1945-1974) saw rapid growth and acceptance of Adoption worldwide. The reasons for Adoption could be many but the most common cited reason is “Infertility”. Normally, Adoptions can occur either between related family members or unrelated individuals though historically most Adoptions took place between related family members. Adoption brought in its ambit new complicated and intricate issues intertwined with Domicile (Lex Domicilii) of a person. In recent years, Adoption and Domicile has become a subject of serious concern owing to the slow paced development and traditional approach of Conflict of Laws by the international community. Against this backdrop, the present paper comparatively analyses the scope of Adoption Laws against Domicile in Western Powers such as Canada, USA and UK against India by suggesting pragmatic remedies to redress this unique blistering issue.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License Terms
Ownership and Licensing:
Authors of research papers submitted to any journal published by The Law Brigade Publishers retain the copyright of their work while granting the journal specific rights. Authors maintain ownership of the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication. Simultaneously, authors agree to license their research papers under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License.
License Permissions:
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 License, others are permitted to share and adapt the work, even for commercial purposes, provided that appropriate attribution is given to the authors, and acknowledgment is made of the initial publication by The Law Brigade Publishers. This license encourages the broad dissemination and reuse of research papers while ensuring that the original work is properly credited.
Additional Distribution Arrangements:
Authors are free to enter into separate, non-exclusive contractual arrangements for distributing the published version of the work (e.g., posting it to institutional repositories or publishing it in books), provided that the original publication by The Law Brigade Publishers is acknowledged.
Online Posting:
Authors are encouraged to share their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on personal websites) both prior to submission and after publication. This practice can facilitate productive exchanges and increase the visibility and citation of the work.
Responsibility and Liability:
Authors are responsible for ensuring that their submitted research papers do not infringe on the copyright, privacy, or other rights of third parties. The Law Brigade Publishers disclaims any liability for any copyright infringement or violation of third-party rights within the submitted research papers.
