THE ARBITRATION & CONCILIATION (AMENDMENT) ACT 2019: GOOD INTENTIONS, BAD OUTCOMES

Authors

  • Abhijeet Sadikale Advocate (Specializing in Dispute Resolution), Bombay High Court Author

Keywords:

Arbitration, Conciliation, international arbitrations

Abstract

The arbitration jurisprudence in India has been ever evolving since the enactment of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“the Act”), with judiciary as well as the legislature contributing immensely to its development. After the round of amendments in 2015, there was a need felt for another round of amendments to rectify some of the mistakes made in 2015 as well as to push the case of institutional arbitration in India, which has been ignored for a long time. It is in this context and based on recommendations of a high-level committee that the legislature introduced the Arbitration & Conciliation (Amendment) Act 2019, which has since partially come into force on 9th August 2019 and has made a flurry of changes to the existing arbitration jurisprudence and structure in India. Whilst most of these changes have been made with good intentions to promote institutional arbitration in India and to make India an attractive destination for international arbitrations, some of these changes are bound to have the opposite effect and adversely affect the progress of arbitration as a means of dispute resolution in India. In this paper, we will analyze the major changes made to the Act by the Arbitration & Conciliation (Amendment) Act 2019 and study its possible outcomes on the current arbitration jurisprudence in India.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

i The Act was amended in 2015 for undoing the effect of certain bad judicial precedents, limiting judicial

intervention and strengthening the arbitration jurisprudence by making it more liberal and progressive.

ii The Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Bill 2018 was initially tabled in Lok Sabha on 10th August 2018.

However, passing of the same was delayed due to the lapse of the 16th session of the Lok Sabha.

iii The Amendment Act was introduced as Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Bill in Rajya Sabha (Upper

House if Indian Parliament) on 15th July 2019. Thereafter, it was first passed by Rajya Sabha on 18th July 2019

and then by Lok Sabha (Lower House of Indian Parliament) on 1st August 2019 and later received the assent of

the President of India on 9th August 2019 and was subsequently published as Act No. 33 of 2019 in the Gazette

of India.

iv Except Sections 2, 3, 10, 14 and 16, all the Sections of the Amendment Act have been notified on 30 August

2019

v The Government of India had appointed a High-Level Committee was under the Chairmanship of the Hon’ble

Mr. Justice B. N. Srikrishna (Retired). The Committee submitted its report to the then Law Minister of India, Mr.

Ravi Shankar Prasad, on 30th July 2017.

vi Part 1A, Sections 43A to 43M inserted by the Amendment Act

vii The ACI is a body corporate with Head Office in New Delhi.

viii Section 43C inserted by the Amendment Act

ix Section 43D (1) & (2) inserted by the Amendment Act

x Section 43D & 43I inserted by the Amendment Act

xi In India, the Government is the biggest litigator. The Government companies are part of major national and

international arbitrations in India.

xii Section 43D (2) (j) inserted by the Amendment Act

xiii The term ‘arbitration institution’ is defined by inserting Section 2 (1) (ca) to the Act by the Amendment Act.

xiv arbitral institution designated by the Supreme Court or a High Court under the Act

xv By inserting Section 11 (3A) to the Act.

xvi Prior to the Amendment Act, the power of appointment of arbitrator/arbitral tribunal was with the concerned

High Court in case of domestic arbitration and Supreme Court of India in case of International Commercial

Arbitration. Under the Amendment Act, the concerned High Court will designate and grade arbitration institution

for domestic arbitration within its jurisdiction and Supreme Court of India will designate and grade arbitration

institution for international commercial arbitration

xvii The panel of arbitrators will be maintained by the Chief Justice of concerned High Court

xviii Singapore’s International Arbitration Act provides for only Singapore International Arbitration Center

(SIAC) as appointing authority, and Hong Kong’s Arbitration Ordinance provides for only Hong Kong

International Arbitration Center (HKIAC) as appointing authority.

xix One Supreme Court of India and twenty-nine High Courts with their own territorial jurisdiction.

Downloads

Published

09-03-2020

How to Cite

THE ARBITRATION & CONCILIATION (AMENDMENT) ACT 2019: GOOD INTENTIONS, BAD OUTCOMES. (2020). Asian Law & Public Policy Review, 5, 25-34. https://journal.thelawbrigade.com/alppr/article/view/62

Similar Articles

1-10 of 31

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.