Nepal’s Flawed Transitional Justice Process

Authors

  • Harsh Mahaseth 5th Year BA LLB Student, NALSAR University of Law Author

Downloads

PlumX DOI based Article Level Metrics

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55662/ALPPR.2018.312

Keywords:

Nepal, justice, international relations

Abstract

Nepal’s peace process included a high level Truth Commission along with other transitional justice measures so as to address the past human rights abuses. While two separate transitional justice commissions- a Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) and a Commission on the Investigation of Disappeared Person (CIEDP), have been established in 2014, the inherent flaws in the laws, political interference in the selection of the members of commission, inadequate resources and non-cooperation of stakeholder have significantly impeded the work of the commission. Therefore, the promises for truth justice and reparation to the victim of armed conflict made by the peace process remains unfulfilled. This demands an urgent reform in the ongoing transitional justice process if Nepal is to achieve long lasting peace and sustainable development. This essay examines the key causes for the failure of the transitional justice process in Nepal. In doing so, it primarily relies on the Supreme Court rulings and international standards which Nepal has committed to.

Readership Data

🌐

Refreshing Cached Analytics Data

The cached analytics data has become stale and journal.thelawbrigade.com is making a fresh request to fetch the latest data from Google Analytics. This may take 20-30 seconds depending on the server response time from Google Analytics. Please do not close the browser during this time. We appreciate your patience.

Citation Metrics

Published

19-12-2018

License

Copyright © 2026 by Harsh Mahaseth

The copyright and license terms mentioned on this page take precedence over any other license terms mentioned on the article full text PDF or any other material associated with the article.

How to Cite

Mahaseth, Harsh. “Nepal’s Flawed Transitional Justice Process”. Asian Law & Public Policy Review, vol. 3, Dec. 2018, pp. 130-7, https://doi.org/10.55662/ALPPR.2018.312.

Citations List

Similar Articles

1-10 of 44

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.