A Shift from Constructive Unamendability to Codified Petrification— The Identification of the Fifteenth Amendment as an Undesirable Constitutional Dismemberment in Bangladesh

Authors

  • Md. Isfar Tehami Sarker Lecturer, Department of Law and Human Rights, Varendra University, Rajshahi, Bangladesh Author

Downloads

PlumX DOI based Article Level Metrics

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55662/SALRJ.2025.1102

Keywords:

Constitution of Bangladesh, Fifteenth Amendment

Abstract

The Constitution of Bangladesh is the solemn will of the people written at the dawn of the nation’s history as the supreme law of the land. Initially, it was a rigid yet amendable one and over the course of next four decades, the restrictions over amendment process has evolved into a hybrid mechanism of both interpretive and constructive unamendabilities. In 2011, the constructive unamendability has been replaced with new provisions petrifying an one-third of the Constitution through the Fifteenth Amendment which was not introduced in a constitutionally coherent way. The petrification has been protected through Article 7B which is popularly termed an an eternal clause owing to its self-entrenching character. This provision has recently been declared unconstitutional by the apex judiciary of Bangladesh. This paper will provide an identification of the Fifteenth Amendment as a potential instance of an undesirable constitutional dismemberment in Bangladesh.

Readership Data

🌐

Refreshing Cached Analytics Data

The cached analytics data has become stale and journal.thelawbrigade.com is making a fresh request to fetch the latest data from Google Analytics. This may take 20-30 seconds depending on the server response time from Google Analytics. Please do not close the browser during this time. We appreciate your patience.

References

1. Abeyratne, R., & Yap, P. J. (2022). Constitutional dismemberments, basic structure doctrine, and pragmatic justifications in context: A rejoinder. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 20(2), 905–910. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moac047 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moac047

2. Ahmed, K. (2023). Revisiting judicial review of constitutional amendments in Bangladesh: Article 7B, the asaduzzaman case, and the fall of the basic structure doctrine. Israel Law Review, 56(2), 263–287. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0021223721000297 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021223721000297

3. Albert, R. (2019). Constitutional amendments: Making, breaking, and changing constitutions. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190640484.001.0001

4. Albert, R. (2022). Constitutional dismemberment in constitutional design. DPCE Online. https://www.dpceonline.it/index.php/dpceonline/article/view/1659

5. Chowdhury J. A., Islam M. and Al Mamun A. (2023), Protecting secularism in Bangladesh: A critique of the constitutional unamendability approach. Rajshahi University Law Journal, Vol. XI, 108-132

6. Chowdhury, R. (2014). The doctrine of basic structure in Bangladesh: From 'Calfpath' to Matryoshka dolls. Bangladesh Journal of Law, (14: 1& 2,)

7. Hoque, R. (2011). Judicial activism in Bangladesh: A golden mean approach. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

8. Khan, A. A. (2015). The politics of constitutional amendments in Bangladesh: The case of the non-political caretaker government. International Review of Law, 2015(3), 9. https://doi.org/10.5339/irl.2015.9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5339/irl.2015.9

9. Roznai, Y. (2013). Unconstitutional constitutional amendments: The migration and success of a constitutional idea. American Journal of Comparative Law, 61(3), 563–606. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/acs020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5131/AJCL.2012.0027

10. Roznai, Y. (2014). Unconstitutional constitutional amendments: a study of the nature and limits of constitutional amendment powers.(PhD thesis). London School of Economics and Political Science. https://etheses.lse.ac.uk/915/

11. Sarker, Md. I. (2023). A critical analysis of the impacts of Article 7B of the Constitution over constitutionalism in Bangladesh. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4656048 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4656048

12. Sayeed, M. A., & Aktar, L. (2022). “constitutional dismemberment” and the problem of pragmatism in siddiqui: A reply to Po Jen Yap and Rehan Abeyratne. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 20(2), 890–904. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moac049 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moac049

13. Sayeed, M. A., & Aktar, L. (2023). Between a Republican and a Bengalee State: Confronting exclusionary constitutionalism in Bangladesh. Global Constitutionalism, 12(3), 562–589. https://doi.org/10.1017/s2045381723000084 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381723000084

1. Sarkar, A., & Rahman, A. (2024, December 18). 15th amendment to constitution: HC scraps part that abolished caretaker system. The Daily Star. https://www.thedailystar.net/news/bangladesh/news/15th-amendment-constitution-hc-scraps-part-abolished-caretaker-system-3778971

Citation Metrics

Published

10-11-2025

License

Copyright © 2026 by Md. Isfar Tehami Sarker

The copyright and license terms mentioned on this page take precedence over any other license terms mentioned on the article full text PDF or any other material associated with the article.

How to Cite

Sarker, Md. Isfar Tehami. “A Shift from Constructive Unamendability to Codified Petrification— The Identification of the Fifteenth Amendment As an Undesirable Constitutional Dismemberment in Bangladesh”. South Asian Law Review Journal, vol. 11, Nov. 2025, pp. 19-31, https://doi.org/10.55662/SALRJ.2025.1102.

Citations List

Similar Articles

31-40 of 41

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.