MC MEHTA VS THE UNION OF INDIA: CASE COMMENT

Authors

  • Hamzah Patel 1st year BA LLB, NALSAR, Hyderabad, India Author

Downloads

Abstract

Through this case comment, I seek to bring out the essentiality and critique of the judicial pronouncement in the 1986 case of “MC Mehta Vs. Union of India” contextualizing the jurisprudential application Absolute liability under the framework set after the Shriram Food and Fertilisers Ltd. tragedy which was about application of article 21i and 32ii of constitution alongside the environmental laws. I will direct focus towards the judicial rationale creating a theoretical foundation for subsequent discursive analysis and seek to clarify the essence of replacement of strict liability with absolute. Ultimately, I attempt to engage in a consequential analysis while clarifying the possible implications of the judgment in a setting of increasing environmental and public health consciousness while also taking into consideration some of the tenets of the constitution of India. Utilizing such analysis, this draft attempt to shed light upon a few inevitable inadequacies of the decision.

Readership Data

🌐

Refreshing Cached Analytics Data

The cached analytics data has become stale and journal.thelawbrigade.com is making a fresh request to fetch the latest data from Google Analytics. This may take 20-30 seconds depending on the server response time from Google Analytics. Please do not close the browser during this time. We appreciate your patience.

Published

02-11-2023

License

Copyright © 2026 by Hamzah Patel

The copyright and license terms mentioned on this page take precedence over any other license terms mentioned on the article full text PDF or any other material associated with the article.

How to Cite

Patel, Hamzah. “MC MEHTA VS THE UNION OF INDIA: CASE COMMENT”. South Asian Law Review Journal, vol. 9, Nov. 2023, pp. 141-7, https://journal.thelawbrigade.com/salrj/article/view/1177.