STATE IMMUNITY AND INVESTMENT ARBITRATION: CONTRIBUTION TO THE STUDY OF OHADA MEMBER STATES PARTICIPATION TO INVESTOR-STATE ARBITRATION

Authors

  • Manga Bineli Timothee Ph.D. Student, Faculty of Law, University of Ngaoundéré (Cameroon) Author

Downloads

Abstract

The participation of member states of the organization for the harmonization of business law in Africa (OHADA) in investment arbitration, although promoted in the recent reform of the OHADA uniform act on arbitration, is heavily limited by state immunity. The latter, considered as a natural law for states, does not allow the effective participation of OHADA member states in investor-state arbitration. However, in this type of Arbitration, which is considered to be a mixed arbitration, the principle of autonomy requires the parties to be bound by their agreement. OHADA law does not specify the fate of State immunity when a State consents to investment arbitration. With a view to taking into account both the public and private interests of the parties to investment arbitration, it is proposed that there should be a limitation of State immunity for a better participation of OHADA member States in investor-state arbitration.

Readership Data

🌐

Refreshing Cached Analytics Data

The cached analytics data has become stale and journal.thelawbrigade.com is making a fresh request to fetch the latest data from Google Analytics. This may take 20-30 seconds depending on the server response time from Google Analytics. Please do not close the browser during this time. We appreciate your patience.

Published

02-10-2019

License

Copyright © 2026 by Manga Bineli Timothee

The copyright and license terms mentioned on this page take precedence over any other license terms mentioned on the article full text PDF or any other material associated with the article.

How to Cite

Timothee, Manga. “STATE IMMUNITY AND INVESTMENT ARBITRATION: CONTRIBUTION TO THE STUDY OF OHADA MEMBER STATES PARTICIPATION TO INVESTOR-STATE ARBITRATION”. South Asian Law Review Journal, vol. 5, Oct. 2019, pp. 362-78, https://journal.thelawbrigade.com/salrj/article/view/1091.