CASE COMMENT: SUPREME COURT ADVOCATES ON-RECORD ASSN. V. UNION OF INDIA 2016

Authors

  • Rohan Naik 2nd Year BBA LLB Student, School of Law, Christ (Deemed to be University) Author

Downloads

Abstract

The debate on appointment of judges was debated and discussed in the Three Judges Cases. In The First Judges’ Case, i.e. S.P. Gupta v. Union of India, the court, with majority held that the consultation of the Chief Justice was nothing more than a suggestion and not a selection. The executive had the ultimate power to select and appoint judges but was not restricted from taking into consideration the Chief Justice’s suggestion. This decision was viewed and was adhered to the literal interpretation of constitutional provisions. This decision was widely perceived as failing to secure the judicial independence. This also seemed to safeguard the privacy of the Executive.

Readership Data

🌐

Refreshing Cached Analytics Data

The cached analytics data has become stale and journal.thelawbrigade.com is making a fresh request to fetch the latest data from Google Analytics. This may take 20-30 seconds depending on the server response time from Google Analytics. Please do not close the browser during this time. We appreciate your patience.

Published

01-02-2018

License

Copyright © 2026 by Rohan Naik

The copyright and license terms mentioned on this page take precedence over any other license terms mentioned on the article full text PDF or any other material associated with the article.

How to Cite

Naik, Rohan. “CASE COMMENT: SUPREME COURT ADVOCATES ON-RECORD ASSN. V. UNION OF INDIA 2016”. South Asian Law Review Journal, vol. 4, Feb. 2018, pp. 126-31, https://journal.thelawbrigade.com/salrj/article/view/1063.