VALIDITY OF NAZI LAW

Authors

  • Radhika Kapoor Legal Intern, International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia Author

Downloads

Abstract

In 1945, the world celebrated the end of one of the two most historically important wars it had ever seen. However, the international legal community was faced with a problem of a kind it had never encountered before: that of awarding retrospective punishment for acts that had been legal under the Third Reich. The legal system that prevailed in Hitler’s authoritarian regime of the Third Reich permitted (and even mandated) the performance of certain acts that modern law would classify as atrocities. Two infamous examples are first, the persecution of Jews: their elimination, torture, enslavement and detention by Nazi authorities; second, the utilisation of oppressive Nazi law by the German citizenry to further its own interests. The international community dealt with both these issues in the Nuremberg Trials and the Grudge Informer cases respectively. The first part of this Paper focuses on a study of the Nuremberg Trials and how a decision was reached therein.

Readership Data

🌐

Refreshing Cached Analytics Data

The cached analytics data has become stale and journal.thelawbrigade.com is making a fresh request to fetch the latest data from Google Analytics. This may take 20-30 seconds depending on the server response time from Google Analytics. Please do not close the browser during this time. We appreciate your patience.

Published

01-02-2018

License

Copyright © 2026 by Radhika Kapoor

The copyright and license terms mentioned on this page take precedence over any other license terms mentioned on the article full text PDF or any other material associated with the article.

How to Cite

Kapoor, Radhika. “VALIDITY OF NAZI LAW”. South Asian Law Review Journal, vol. 4, Feb. 2018, pp. 58-71, https://journal.thelawbrigade.com/salrj/article/view/1057.