CASE NOTE ON CASE CONCERNING QUESTIONS RELATING TO THE OBLIGATION TO PROSECUTE OR EXTRADITE (BELGIUM V. SENEGAL)

Authors

  • Nidhi Singh Author

Downloads

Abstract

The International Court of Justice (ICJ) issued on July 20, 2012 a long awaited judgment in a case brought by Belgium against Senegal regarding the latter’s failure to prosecute former Chadian dictator Hissène Habré confirming the obligation of states parties to the United Nations Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, 1984 (“UNCAT”) to either prosecute alleged perpetrators or extradite them to another country with jurisdiction for prosecution. The desire to prosecute Mr. Habré for crimes of torture committed during his eight year presidency of Chad has led to a stream of national and international litigation. The Convention adopted under the auspices of the United Nations in 1984 currently has 151 states parties who are required to take effective measures to prevent torture and hold accountable those who engage in torture.

Readership Data

🌐

Refreshing Cached Analytics Data

The cached analytics data has become stale and journal.thelawbrigade.com is making a fresh request to fetch the latest data from Google Analytics. This may take 20-30 seconds depending on the server response time from Google Analytics. Please do not close the browser during this time. We appreciate your patience.

Published

01-02-2018

License

Copyright © 2026 by Nidhi Singh

The copyright and license terms mentioned on this page take precedence over any other license terms mentioned on the article full text PDF or any other material associated with the article.

How to Cite

Nidhi Singh, Nidhi Singh. “CASE NOTE ON CASE CONCERNING QUESTIONS RELATING TO THE OBLIGATION TO PROSECUTE OR EXTRADITE (BELGIUM V. SENEGAL)”. South Asian Law Review Journal, vol. 4, Feb. 2018, pp. 1-5, https://journal.thelawbrigade.com/salrj/article/view/1048.