Impact of Forest Legislation on Gender Roles in Indigenous Forest-based Employment in West Bengal
Downloads
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55662/IJLDAI.2026.12501Keywords:
Forest legislation, Indigenous women, Non-timber forest products, Feminist political ecology, Forest Rights Act, Joint Forest Management, West BengalAbstract
This study examines the impact of forest legislation on gender roles in indigenous forest-based employment in West Bengal, with particular emphasis on women’s traditional roles in non-timber forest product (NTFP) gathering and their statutory employment rights. Adopting an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design grounded in feminist political ecology, the research evaluates empirical data from selected forest-fringe villages inhabited by Santhal, Munda, and Lodha communities. The study integrates household surveys (????=120), focus group discussions, and qualitative case studies across Jhargram, Bankura, and Purulia districts. Findings reveal that historical and contemporary forest legislation restructures traditional gendered divisions of labor. While indigenous women historically held central roles in fuelwood collection, sal leaf processing, medicinal plant gathering, and minor forest produce marketing, their customary rights were severely constrained under centralized colonial and post-colonial state policies. Although the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 (FRA) legally expands formal recognition of community and individual rights, female forest dwellers do not access these benefits equitably due to bureaucratic barriers, legal illiteracy, and persistent patriarchal norms within governance structures. Case studies demonstrate partial economic support through self-help groups and Joint Forest Management (JFM) committees; however, decision-making authority remains overwhelmingly male-dominated. The study concludes that gender-sensitive policy implementation, institutional reforms, and strict enforcement of joint titling are essential for ensuring equitable forest-based employment and sustainable livelihood security among indigenous women in West Bengal.
External References to this Article
Loading reference data...
References
Agarwal, B. (2001). Participatory exclusions, community forestry, and gender: An analysis for South Asia and a conceptual framework. World Development, 29(10), 1623–1648. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00066-3
Agarwal, B. (2009). Gender and forest conservation: The impact of women's participation in community forest governance. Ecological Economics, 68(11), 2785–2799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.04.025
Agarwal, B. (2010). Gender and Green Governance: The Political Economy of Women’s Presence Within and Beyond Community Forestry. Oxford University Press.
Bandi, M. (2013). Women and Community Forestry in India: Exploring Gendered Impacts of Forest Management. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 20(2), 243–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971521513484203
Bandi, M., & Ramesh, M. (2016). Gendered exclusions in forest rights: Insights from tribal areas in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 51(52), 48–56.
Bhattacharya, P., & Basu, P. (2017). Livelihood generation through non-timber forest products: A case study of West Bengal, India. International Journal of Forestry Research, 2017, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4721603
Bray, D. B., Merino-Perez, L., & Barry, D. (2006). The Community Forests of Mexico: Managing for Sustainable Landscapes. University of Texas Press.
Chakrabarti, S., & Rana, P. (2020). Women, forest rights and the Forest Rights Act in West Bengal. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 27(1), 63–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971521519896826
Deb, D., Malhotra, K. C., & Sinha, D. (2012). Sacred groves of West Bengal: A study in cultural ecology. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge, 11(2), 377–386.
Karthikeyan, M. (2019). Marginalizing the margins: Tribal women and the implementation of the Forest Rights Act in India. Environment and Society, 10(1), 69–87.
Kelkar, G., & Nathan, D. (2005). Gender relations and the energy transition in rural Asia. IDS Bulletin, 36(3), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2005.tb00203.x
Kishwar, M. (2014). Bamboo Rights for Forest Dwellers in Maharashtra: The Role of Women’s SHGs. Manushi, 186, 45–52.
Kumar, N., & Kerr, J. (2012). Democratic assertions: The making of India’s recognition of forest rights. Development and Change, 43(3), 751–771. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2012.01776.x
Lele, S., Menon, A., & Pathak, N. (2020). Democratizing forest governance in India. Foundation for Ecological Security.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE Publications.
Ministry of Tribal Affairs. (2008). The Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006: Rules and guidelines. Government of India.
Mwangi, E., Meinzen-Dick, R., & Sun, Y. (2011). Gender and sustainable forest management in East Africa and Latin America. Ecology and Society, 16(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03853-160117
Pulhin, J. M. (2002). Tenure reform and forest management: The case of the Philippines. In C. J. Pierce Colfer & Y. Byron (Eds.), People Managing Forests: The Links Between Human Well-being and Sustainability (pp. 121–144). Resources for the Future.
Rocheleau, D., & Edmunds, D. (1997). Women, men and trees: Gender, power and property in forest and agrarian landscapes. World Development, 25(8), 1351–1371. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(97)00036-3
Rocheleau, D., Thomas-Slayter, B., & Wangari, E. (Eds.). (1996). Feminist Political Ecology: Global Issues and Local Experiences. Routledge.
Roy, B., & Mazumdar, R. (2016). Tribal women's livelihood and forest rights in West Bengal: An empirical study. Journal of Social Inclusion Studies, 2(1), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/2394481116630711
Sarin, M., Singh, N. M., Sundar, N., & Bhogal, R. K. (2003). Devolution as a threat to democratic decision-making in forestry? Findings from three states in India. ODI Forest Policy and Environment Group.
Sarin, M., Singh, N., Sundar, N., & Bhogal, R. K. (1998). Who is gaining? Who is losing? Gender and equity concerns in Joint Forest Management. Society for Promotion of Wastelands Development.
Shanley, P., & Gaia, G. R. (2002). Equitable ecological relationships? The gendered impacts of extractive industries in Amazonian Brazil. In C. J. Colfer & M. Byron (Eds.), People Managing Forests (pp. 89–110). Resources for the Future.
Sundar, N. (2011). The Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006: Implications for women. Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(3), 619–642.
License Terms
Ownership and Licensing:
Authors of research papers submitted to any journal published by The Law Brigade Publishers retain the copyright of their work while granting the journal specific rights. Authors maintain ownership of the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication. Simultaneously, authors agree to license their research papers under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License.
License Permissions:
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 License, others are permitted to share and adapt the work, even for commercial purposes, provided that appropriate attribution is given to the authors, and acknowledgment is made of the initial publication by The Law Brigade Publishers. This license encourages the broad dissemination and reuse of research papers while ensuring that the original work is properly credited.
Additional Distribution Arrangements:
Authors are free to enter into separate, non-exclusive contractual arrangements for distributing the published version of the work (e.g., posting it to institutional repositories or publishing it in books), provided that the original publication by The Law Brigade Publishers is acknowledged.
Online Posting:
Authors are encouraged to share their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on personal websites) both prior to submission and after publication. This practice can facilitate productive exchanges and increase the visibility and citation of the work.
Responsibility and Liability:
Authors are responsible for ensuring that their submitted research papers do not infringe on the copyright, privacy, or other rights of third parties. The Law Brigade Publishers disclaims any liability for any copyright infringement or violation of third-party rights within the submitted research papers.
Citation Metrics
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Shayani Chakraborty (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright © 2026 by Shayani Chakraborty
The copyright and license terms mentioned on this page take precedence over any other license terms mentioned on the article full text PDF or any other material associated with the article.
