THE “EFFECTIVE CONTROL” REGIME: A CONTRADICTION TO THE UNIVERSAL NATURE OF HUMAN RIGHTS OBLIGATIONS

Authors

  • Hrishikesh Joshi 5th Year BALLB Student, New Law College, Bharti Vidyapeeth University Author

Downloads

PlumX DOI based Article Level Metrics

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55662/

Abstract

The essay question places an opinion on the current status quo regarding the extraterritorial human rights obligation of States. It puts forth the opinion, as an answer to the question, that the international treaties and conventions regarding State obligation to protect and fulfil human rights beyond its territory is limited by the prevalent definitions of 'jurisdiction' which do not allow a State to exercise its human rights obligations beyond territories or persons under its "effective control". This contradicts the promise enumerated in Article 28, the idea of universality of human rights and the fact that States can in fact exercise influence beyond its borders/jurisdiction due to rapid globalization and digital developments.

Readership Data

🌐

Refreshing Cached Analytics Data

The cached analytics data has become stale and journal.thelawbrigade.com is making a fresh request to fetch the latest data from Google Analytics. This may take 20-30 seconds depending on the server response time from Google Analytics. Please do not close the browser during this time. We appreciate your patience.

Citation Metrics

Published

02-02-2019

License

Copyright © 2026 by Hrishikesh Joshi

The copyright and license terms mentioned on this page take precedence over any other license terms mentioned on the article full text PDF or any other material associated with the article.

How to Cite

Hrishikesh Joshi. “THE ‘EFFECTIVE CONTROL’ REGIME: A CONTRADICTION TO THE UNIVERSAL NATURE OF HUMAN RIGHTS OBLIGATIONS”. International Journal of Legal Developments & Allied Issues, vol. 5, no. 1, Feb. 2019, pp. 13-17, https://doi.org/10.55662/.

Citations List