THE NJAC JUDGMENT: ESTABLISHING JUDICIAL SUPREMACY

Authors

  • Surabhi Vats 4th Year BA LLB Student, Jindal Global Law School Author

PlumX DOI based Article Level Metrics

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55662/

Abstract

This paper analyses the historical NJAC Judgment delivered by the Supreme Court. The paper focuses on the Judgment delivered by Justice Kehar, which forms part of the majority opinion. The jurisprudential qualities of the judgment are examined in the paper. It is argued that the Judgment has certain shortcomings. The judgment is not able to substantiate as to why Judicial primacy in appointments forms a part of the basic structure of the Constitution. It is also not explained as to how judicial primacy promotes judicial independence. This paper also analyses appointment of Judges in some other countries, it is pointed out that no other democracy provides only the sitting judges the sole power to make judicial appointments. 

This paper is divided into three parts. The first part provides a brief overview of the judgment. The second part, analyses the basic structure doctrine through case laws laid down by the Supreme Court of India, it also analyses the Primacy of judiciary vis the basic structure doctrine. The third part, compares and analyses the appointment of Judges in various other democracies. 

Readership Data

🌐

Refreshing Cached Analytics Data

The cached analytics data has become stale and journal.thelawbrigade.com is making a fresh request to fetch the latest data from Google Analytics. This may take 20-30 seconds depending on the server response time from Google Analytics. Please do not close the browser during this time. We appreciate your patience.

Citation Metrics

Published

25-10-2018

License

Copyright © 2026 by Surabhi Vats

The copyright and license terms mentioned on this page take precedence over any other license terms mentioned on the article full text PDF or any other material associated with the article.

How to Cite

Surabhi Vats. “THE NJAC JUDGMENT: ESTABLISHING JUDICIAL SUPREMACY”. International Journal of Legal Developments & Allied Issues, vol. 4, no. 5, Oct. 2018, pp. 376-83, https://doi.org/10.55662/.

Citations List