PHILOSOPHICAL CONCEPT OF ANIMAL RIGHTS

Authors

  • Akash Sugumar 3rd year BBA LLB Student, School of Law, Christ University Author

Downloads

PlumX DOI based Article Level Metrics

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55662/

Abstract

People's perspectives of creatures have progressed especially since the times of seventeenth century savant René Descartes, who proclaimed creatures to be close to negligible natural machines. This view was tested by Jeremy Bentham, who developed a proactive anticruelty development and helped shape lawful changes went for enhancing welfare. For this he has been known as the "main benefactor holy person of creature rights". Bentham's celebrated reference, written in 1823, expressed that in evaluating whether to offer thought to creatures, "the inquiry isn't, can they reason? Nor, can they talk? However, can they endure?"

Bentham's approach was utilitarian and reformist: he acknowledged the authenticity of using creatures for human advantage, however contended that superfluous enduring, i.e. savagery, ought to be dispensed with. Bentham expressed, "each demonstration by which, without prospect of dominant great, torment is purposely and eagerly delivered in any being at all, is a demonstration of remorselessness".

Readership Data

🌐

Refreshing Cached Analytics Data

The cached analytics data has become stale and journal.thelawbrigade.com is making a fresh request to fetch the latest data from Google Analytics. This may take 20-30 seconds depending on the server response time from Google Analytics. Please do not close the browser during this time. We appreciate your patience.

Citation Metrics

Published

11-10-2018

License

Copyright © 2026 by Akash Sugumar

The copyright and license terms mentioned on this page take precedence over any other license terms mentioned on the article full text PDF or any other material associated with the article.

How to Cite

Akash Sugumar. “PHILOSOPHICAL CONCEPT OF ANIMAL RIGHTS”. International Journal of Legal Developments & Allied Issues, vol. 4, no. 5, Oct. 2018, pp. 14-27, https://doi.org/10.55662/.

Citations List