FAIR USE IN CONTEXT OF MASHUPS: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF US, UK AND INDIA
Downloads
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55662/Abstract
This paper analyzes evolution of copyright act along with development of mashups industry. I have tried to compare the rights of mashup’s artists with the right original artists in various countries like India, US and UK. I have focused on various exceptions that they can use in case of any infringement of rights of original artists. In the end, I have emphasized on the need of special laws to protect the interest of mashup artists
Framers or creator of copyright have tried to maintain a balance between monopolization and protection of an artist’s right. Copyright plays a key role in encouraging people to explore the field of creativity. However, one needs to make sure that such protection do not create monopoly which restricts others from exploring any other ideas of creativity. Legislators and courts have evolved the principal of fair use to maintain the balance.
However, the concept of fair use has been applied differently in various countries. In US, the courts have laid down various tests to justify the use of protected piece that was within the ambit of fair use. Some of the tests are: nature of work, purpose of use, and many more. However, India and UK have an exhaustive list that lays down the scope of fair use. Courts have evolved some tests to determine scope of fair use in these countries, however, when compared with US, the scope is still restrictive.
Music has evolved with technology. There have been multiple innovations that have resulted in modern music. A very common practice of making mashups, which includes using and combining music or lyrics of different songs to create a new music, has evolved over time. This style of music is very much similar to sampling. These practices have raised multiple questions regarding copyright infringement of the original artist.
Such infringement can be defended on two grounds. One of them is de Minimis, which means insignificant copying. In copyright, principal of de Minimis stands for minimal copying for which no infringement can be claimed. Second ground for such defense is fair use. If copying is within the ambit of fair use, then no infringement can be claimed.
In this paper, we have analyzed evolution of copyright act along with development of mashups. In the first part we have tried to introduce and define the concept of mashups highlighting differences between mashups and remix, along with the history of mashups. In the second part we have analyzed the scope of copyright and infringement of rights of original artist that happens through mashups. In the third part we have discussed the principal of de Minimis as defense of copyright infringement including the minimal limit of copying that would constitute infringement in various countries. In the fourth part we have discussed fair use and have compared distinction of the fair use principal in various countries like US, UK and India. Finally, we have concluded this paper by analyzing the impact of inefficient copyright laws on music industries and how it has restricted the creativity of various artists, which is against the spirit of copyright. The spirit of copyright entails to encourage creativity by providing some rights and protection to the artist that must not result in monopoly.
External References to this Article
Loading reference data...
License Terms
Ownership and Licensing:
Authors of research papers submitted to any journal published by The Law Brigade Publishers retain the copyright of their work while granting the journal specific rights. Authors maintain ownership of the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication. Simultaneously, authors agree to license their research papers under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License.
License Permissions:
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 License, others are permitted to share and adapt the work, even for commercial purposes, provided that appropriate attribution is given to the authors, and acknowledgment is made of the initial publication by The Law Brigade Publishers. This license encourages the broad dissemination and reuse of research papers while ensuring that the original work is properly credited.
Additional Distribution Arrangements:
Authors are free to enter into separate, non-exclusive contractual arrangements for distributing the published version of the work (e.g., posting it to institutional repositories or publishing it in books), provided that the original publication by The Law Brigade Publishers is acknowledged.
Online Posting:
Authors are encouraged to share their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on personal websites) both prior to submission and after publication. This practice can facilitate productive exchanges and increase the visibility and citation of the work.
Responsibility and Liability:
Authors are responsible for ensuring that their submitted research papers do not infringe on the copyright, privacy, or other rights of third parties. The Law Brigade Publishers disclaims any liability for any copyright infringement or violation of third-party rights within the submitted research papers.
Citation Metrics
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright © 2026 by Sunidhi Bansal, Shruti Agarwal
The copyright and license terms mentioned on this page take precedence over any other license terms mentioned on the article full text PDF or any other material associated with the article.
