TRIPLE TALAQ: WAS IT JUSTIFIED OR A CONVENIENCE FOR MALES

Authors

  • Dr. Neeta Beri Author

Downloads

PlumX DOI based Article Level Metrics

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55662/

Abstract

Triple Talaq, also known as talaq-e-biddat, instant divorce. 1 and talaq-e-mughallazah (irrevocable divorce),2 is a form of Islamic divorce which has been used by Muslims in India, especially adherents of Hanafi Sunni Islamic schools of jurisprudence.3  It allows any Muslim man to legally divorce his wife by stating the word talaq (the Arabic word for "divorce") three times in oral, written, or more recently, electronic form.

The use and status of triple talaq in India has been a subject of controversy and debate. Those questioning the practice have raised issues of justice, gender equality, human rights and secularism. The debate has involved the Government of India and the Supreme Court of India, and is connected to the debate about a uniform civil code in India. 4 On 22 August 2017, the Indian Supreme Court deemed instant triple talaq (talaq-e-biddah) unconstitutional.5 Three of the five judges in the panel concurred that the practice of triple talaq is unconstitutional.6 The remaining two declared the practice to be constitutional while simultaneously asking the government to ban the practice by enacting a law. 7

Readership Data

🌐

Refreshing Cached Analytics Data

The cached analytics data has become stale and journal.thelawbrigade.com is making a fresh request to fetch the latest data from Google Analytics. This may take 20-30 seconds depending on the server response time from Google Analytics. Please do not close the browser during this time. We appreciate your patience.

Citation Metrics

Published

27-04-2018

License

Copyright © 2026 by Dr. Neeta Beri

The copyright and license terms mentioned on this page take precedence over any other license terms mentioned on the article full text PDF or any other material associated with the article.

How to Cite

Dr. Neeta Beri. “TRIPLE TALAQ: WAS IT JUSTIFIED OR A CONVENIENCE FOR MALES”. International Journal of Legal Developments & Allied Issues, vol. 4, no. 2, Apr. 2018, pp. 214-20, https://doi.org/10.55662/.

Citations List