CAPITAL GAINS TAX- A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF VODAFONE’S CASE

Authors

  • Aditya Rajasthani 5th BA LLB Student, Tamil Nadu National Law School, Tiruchirappalli Author
  • Reuben Philip Abraham 5th BA LLB Student, Tamil Nadu National Law School, Tiruchirappalli Author

Downloads

PlumX DOI based Article Level Metrics

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55662/

Abstract

Article 265 of the Indian Constitution provides: “No tax shall be levied or collected except by authority of law”. Any compulsory exaction of money by Government amounts to imposition of tax (basically imposed for public purpose for raising the general revenue of the State) which is not permissible except by or under the authority of a statutory provision.  The effectiveness of Taxing Statues depends on the means through which interpretation is shrewdly adopted as it imposes unique confrontations to legal interpretations and its technicalities aren’t an easy breakthrough. 

The Vodafone case had been shrouded in uncertainty till 2012.The tale began as early in February 2007 when Vodafone International Holdings (hereinafter Vodafone or VIH), a Dutch entity, had acquired 100 percent shares in CGP (Holdings) Limited (hereinafter CGP), a Cayman Islands company for USD 11.1 billion from Hutchinson Telecommunications International Limited (hereinafter HTIL).  A dramatic turn of events after sometime led to legal battle between the Indian Income Tax Department on the one side and Vodafone on the other for the astronomical figure in question: Rs. 12, 000 Crores which raised the eyebrows of many business and legal circles in India. 

There wasn’t any case of much gravity before Vodafone pertaining to Tax dispute in India.  In this connection, the author would firstly elaborately discuss the meaning and origin of ‘Capital Gains Tax’ (hereinafter CGT) and its relevancy to Vodafone. Secondly, the author would also compare the various provisions of CGT (Sections 45-55A) under the “Income Tax Act, 1961” (hereinafter IT Act) by exploring its applicability and intricacies and bringing into limelight the numerous loopholes in Vodafone with respect to CGT. Since Vodafone is a case of much magnitude from the viewpoint of Corporate Law, Investment Arbitration and Tax Law, the author would additionally focus on these wide interpretations and perspectives on Vodafone

The last leg of this paper would deal with suitable remedies and suggestions for the better application and implementation of CGT under Tax laws and amendments or new incorporations to the relevant provisions of CGT under IT Act if necessary.    

 

Readership Data

🌐

Refreshing Cached Analytics Data

The cached analytics data has become stale and journal.thelawbrigade.com is making a fresh request to fetch the latest data from Google Analytics. This may take 20-30 seconds depending on the server response time from Google Analytics. Please do not close the browser during this time. We appreciate your patience.

Citation Metrics

Published

02-10-2017

License

Copyright © 2026 by Aditya Rajasthani, Reuben Philip Abraham

The copyright and license terms mentioned on this page take precedence over any other license terms mentioned on the article full text PDF or any other material associated with the article.

How to Cite

Aditya Rajasthani, and Reuben Philip Abraham. “CAPITAL GAINS TAX- A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF VODAFONE’S CASE ”. International Journal of Legal Developments & Allied Issues, vol. 3, no. 5, Oct. 2017, pp. 214-2, https://doi.org/10.55662/.

Citations List