PRISONER’S RIGHT: EVOLVING JURISPRUDENCE

Authors

  • Pooja Mishra 2nd Year BA LLB Student, Balaji Law College, Pune University Author
  • Megha Pradhan 3rd Year BA LLB Student, Balaji Law College, Pune University Author
  • Shashankshri Tripathi 3rd Year BA LLB Student, Balaji Law College, Pune University Author

Downloads

PlumX DOI based Article Level Metrics

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55662/

Abstract

Imprisonment is one of the   most common method of punishment adopted by almost in all countries in order to punish for the offence. The proof for the same can be seen in ancient history .Historically the main objective of punishment was of two folded— deprivation of the prisoner from social life and his segregation from the society as to ensure security in society. In course of time, however, several purposes such as deterrence, incapacitation and reformations came to be recognised .Even it do not possess any deterrence value, then to it give a time for a accused to sit and realise his mistake which he has done in past.Revenge, maybe the most old and premier reason for discipline, came to be clarified in a extremely prominent yet sad explanation: 'tit for tat furthermore, a tooth for a tooth'. For the man in the road it is the rough type of reprisal the general public which takes upon the wrongdoer  at the point when the establishment of detainment started the reason for existing was only requital. Detainment was taken as a type of retribution upon the guilty parties for the wrongdoings.

New theories of crime causation and new approaches to punishment emerged in the earlier part of the nineteenth century. The old free will theory and hedonism were submerged in the flow and the focus was shifted from the individual to the society.

It was regularly contended that the individual wrongdoers were not in charge of getting to be lawbreakers and that societal irregularity opens the way of wrongdoing. Sensible augmentation of this hypothesis makes the general public capable to care for the lawbreakers. Definitely it requires a change of disposition  a change from mistreating as of now discouraged part of lawbreakers to a clearer understanding and liberal convenience of the freaks into the general public. It was a shift from cold-bloodedness to graciousness, from "requital to kind heartedness. The global human rights developments added driving force to this improvement.

Readership Data

🌐

Refreshing Cached Analytics Data

The cached analytics data has become stale and journal.thelawbrigade.com is making a fresh request to fetch the latest data from Google Analytics. This may take 20-30 seconds depending on the server response time from Google Analytics. Please do not close the browser during this time. We appreciate your patience.

Citation Metrics

Published

22-06-2017

License

Copyright © 2026 by Pooja Mishra, Megha Pradhan, Shashankshri Tripathi

The copyright and license terms mentioned on this page take precedence over any other license terms mentioned on the article full text PDF or any other material associated with the article.

How to Cite

Pooja Mishra, et al. “PRISONER’S RIGHT: EVOLVING JURISPRUDENCE”. International Journal of Legal Developments & Allied Issues, vol. 3, no. 3, June 2017, pp. 73-81, https://doi.org/10.55662/.

Citations List