THE LEGAL CAPACITY OF FEDERATED ENTITIES WITH FOREIGN STATES: SOMALILAND-PUNT-LAND PORT PACT DEAL
Keywords:
Somalia, Federal, Foreign, PolicyAbstract
The study examines the legal capacity of federated entities with foreign States especially Puntland and Somaliland’s port agreements with an international subject. The notion of federal State is primarily characterized by a constitutional separation of sovereign competences between the federal Government level on the one hand and the authorities of the sub-national states on the other hand. The main objective of the study is to analyze whether federated entities have powers to exercise in the foreign relations including international agreements. The study employs doctrinal legal methodology and other secondary materials involved. The legal framework centered on this study includes the Federal Constitution of Somalia 2012, Public Procurement Act 2015, Foreign Investment law 2015, the 1970 Declaration of Principles of International law Concerning Friendly Relations and Cooperation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nation, the Vienna Convention on Law of Treaties 1969 while Secondary information includes judicial precedents, text materials, articles, journals, and the internet within and outside Somalia. The study concludes that, the federal Government has, to a large extent, an exclusive executive and legislative competence in matters of international concern. Since the 2012 constitutional reform, the federal government are vested with considerable external competence. The study recommends that, the field of international law of inter-state systems both legal and structural arrangements should adopt a comprehensive action against federal state’s participation in foreign policy in order to defend national interests effectively. Since the question of the treaty-making capacity of a State’s federated entities remains contentious in international order.
Downloads
References
Case Law
Nicaragua vs. United States of America (1986) I.C.J. 14
Brown v. Maryland (1827) 25 U.S. 419 (more) 12 Wheat. 419; 6 L. Ed. 678
Grosby vs. National Foreign Trade Council (2000)
Netherlands vs. USA (1928) II RIAA 829
The Lord Templeman in Watson vs. Dept (1989) 3 ALLER
United Kingdom v. Japan (1923)
Journal and Articles
D. Mumbere, (2018) ‘Somalia Rejects Somaliland Port Deal with Ethiopia and UAE Company’
https://www.africanews.com/2018/03/04/somalia-rejects-somaliland-port-deal-with-ethiopiaand-uae-company//. Accessed 11/Sep/2021
D. Halberstam, (2001), The Foreign Affairs of Federal Systems: A National Perspective on
the Benefits of State Participation, 46 Vill. L. Rev. 1015 Available at:
https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/vlr/vol46/iss5/4. Accessed 4/October/2021
A. M. Farah, (2020), ‘Will the Puntland Parliament expels DP-World, which controls
Bossaso Port’ Puntland Times Newspaper, This document was translated from Somali
language into English Version, available at https://puntlandtimes.ca/2020/06/xogbaarlamaanka-puntland-miyey-ceyrinayaan-shirkada-dp-world-ee-gacanta-ku-haysa-dekedaboosaaso/. Accessed 6/November/2021
F. Oluoch, (2018 )‘Somalia Regions Maintain UAE As Ally Amid Diplomatic Row Over
Port Deals’, the East African Newspaper,) https://www.theeastafrican.co.ke/tea/news/eastafrica/somalia-regions-maintain-uae-as-ally-amid-diplomatic-row-over-port-deals--1393578.
Accessed 4/November/2021
G. Hernández (2015), ‘The Practice of Shared Responsibility in relation to Federal States’
Amsterdam Center for International Law, SHARES Research Paper 66 (2015) available at
http://www.sharesproject.nl/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/66.-Hernandez-Practic.pdf.
accessed on 20/October/2021
H. Istiila, (2018) ‘Somali MPs scrap UAE ports deal’ available at
https://www.aa.com.tr/en/africa/somali-mps-scrap-uae-ports-deal/1086861.
11/September/2021
L. Seleshie (2020), ‘Will Somaliland’s Berbera port be a threat to Djibouti’s?’
https://www.theafricareport.com/54136/will-somalilands-berbera-port-be-a-threat-todjiboutis/. Accessed on 23/September/2021
M Koskenniemi, From Apology to Utopia (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press 2005),
esp. Chapter 4
M. Frank L.M. Van De Craen, ‘The Federated State And Its Treaty-Making Power’ (1982)
available at
http://rbdi.bruylant.be/public/modele/rbdi/content/files/RBDI%201983/RBDI%201983-
1/RBDI%201983.1%20-%20pp.%20377%20%C3%83%C2%A0%20424%20-
%20Frank%20Van%20De%20Craen.pdf. Accessed 4/November/2021
M. Hassan (2017), ‘Somali Official Says Somaliland Deal with UAE Corrupt, Illegal available
at https://www.voanews.com/africa/somali-official-says-somaliland-deal-uae-corrupt-illegal.
Accessed 13/Sep/2021
Matt Kennard, Ismail Einashe (2019), For Somaliland And Djibouti, Will New Friends Bring
Benefits?, available at https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/03/19/somaliland-somalia-horn-ofafrica-djibouti-military-oil-uae-qatar-berbera-port/. Accessed 10/September/2021
Military and Paramilitary Activities (Nicaragua/United States of America) Merits. J. 27.6.1986
I.C.J. Reports 1986, http://www.worldlii.org/int/cases/ICJ/1986/1.html. Accessed
9/September/2012
R. Advani (2019) ‘Constructing Commercial Empire: The United Arab Emirates in the Red
Sea and the Horn’, https://tcf.org/content/report/constructing-commercial-empire-united-arabemirates-red-sea-horn/. Accessed 9/September/2021
S. Robert (2009), Federalism and Foreign Affairs: Mixity as an International Phenomenon
Durham Law School Research Paper, Available at SSRN:
http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1494513. Accessed on 24/September/2021
UN General Assembly, Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly
Relations and Cooperation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations,
24 October 1970, A/RES/2625(XXV), available at:
https://www.refworld.org/docid/3dda1f104.html. Accessed 12 September 2021
Books
A. Kheir (2021) ‘Modern Law of Sea Zones And Its Practice In Somalia’ 2nd Edition, published
by Jescho Co. Ltd, Uganda, Kampala
J. Crawford, (2006) ‘The Creation of States in International law’ 2nd Edition, Oxford,
Clarendon Press
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License Terms
Ownership and Licensing:
Authors of research papers submitted to any journal published by The Law Brigade Publishers retain the copyright of their work while granting the journal specific rights. Authors maintain ownership of the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication. Simultaneously, authors agree to license their research papers under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License.
License Permissions:
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 License, others are permitted to share and adapt the work, even for commercial purposes, provided that appropriate attribution is given to the authors, and acknowledgment is made of the initial publication by The Law Brigade Publishers. This license encourages the broad dissemination and reuse of research papers while ensuring that the original work is properly credited.
Additional Distribution Arrangements:
Authors are free to enter into separate, non-exclusive contractual arrangements for distributing the published version of the work (e.g., posting it to institutional repositories or publishing it in books), provided that the original publication by The Law Brigade Publishers is acknowledged.
Online Posting:
Authors are encouraged to share their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on personal websites) both prior to submission and after publication. This practice can facilitate productive exchanges and increase the visibility and citation of the work.
Responsibility and Liability:
Authors are responsible for ensuring that their submitted research papers do not infringe on the copyright, privacy, or other rights of third parties. The Law Brigade Publishers disclaims any liability for any copyright infringement or violation of third-party rights within the submitted research papers.