PLEA OF INSANITY IN CAPITAL PUNISHMENT CASES: AN INDIAN PERSPECTIVE
Keywords:
INSANITY, CAPITAL PUNISHMENT, INDIAN PERSPECTIVEAbstract
Insanity is one of the most controversial defences in criminal jurisprudence. It has been a valid defence since ancient times. There have been different applications of this defence in various legal systems. Every case in a court of law is like a new one. There is no proper hard and fast rule as to when the court takes this defence as a valid one. In the Indian system, this defence has been regarded as a loophole due to its infirmities. Some scholars advocate that insanity should be accepted as a defense only on the lines of other defences. Like when there is lack of mens rea or self defense or duress. The only catch is defense of insanity is always used as a mitigating factor. It is never assessed on the basis of above factors. In this backdrop, it is very difficult for the courts to be the decision maker. Especially in the capital punishment cases, it is very difficult to decide on the plea of insanity. Capital punishment cases in themselves pose a controversial stand in the Indian judiciary. In such scenario where would the plea of insanity stand. The objective of this study is to find out whether there is a need for reforming the existing law regarding insanity. The main point of argument is would there be a need to shift it from being a loophole to a double-edged sword. The researcher tries to analyse the existing stand of the courts by looking through some case laws in the past two decades where the plea of insanity was allowed and consider the factors for the respective decisions of the court.
Downloads
References
1. Christopher Slobogin, An End to Insanity: Recasting the Role of Mental Disability in
Criminal Cases, Virginia Law Review , Sep., 2000, Vol. 86, No. 6 (Sep., 2000), pp.
1199-1247, https://www.jstor.org/stable/1073944.
2. Parthasarathy Ramamurthy, Vijay Chathoth, and Pradeep Thilakan, HOW DOES
INDIA DECIDE INSANITY PLEAS,
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6436411/.
3. Caryl E. Boehnert, Characteristics of Successful and Unsuccessful Insanity Pleas, Law
and Human Behavior , Mar., 1989, Vol. 13, No. 1 (Mar., 1989), pp. 31-39,
https://www.jstor.org/stable/1393773.
4. P.S. Atchuten Pillai, Criminal Law, 3rd edition.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License Terms
Ownership and Licensing:
Authors of research papers submitted to any journal published by The Law Brigade Publishers retain the copyright of their work while granting the journal specific rights. Authors maintain ownership of the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication. Simultaneously, authors agree to license their research papers under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License.
License Permissions:
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 License, others are permitted to share and adapt the work, even for commercial purposes, provided that appropriate attribution is given to the authors, and acknowledgment is made of the initial publication by The Law Brigade Publishers. This license encourages the broad dissemination and reuse of research papers while ensuring that the original work is properly credited.
Additional Distribution Arrangements:
Authors are free to enter into separate, non-exclusive contractual arrangements for distributing the published version of the work (e.g., posting it to institutional repositories or publishing it in books), provided that the original publication by The Law Brigade Publishers is acknowledged.
Online Posting:
Authors are encouraged to share their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on personal websites) both prior to submission and after publication. This practice can facilitate productive exchanges and increase the visibility and citation of the work.
Responsibility and Liability:
Authors are responsible for ensuring that their submitted research papers do not infringe on the copyright, privacy, or other rights of third parties. The Law Brigade Publishers disclaims any liability for any copyright infringement or violation of third-party rights within the submitted research papers.
