A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE DEATH PENALTY APPLICABLE LAWS
Downloads
Keywords:
capital punishment, cruel, death penalty, infliction, degrading punishment, inhuman, human rights, fair trial, retribution, right to life, torture, executionAbstract
For a long time, the debate surrounding the pertinent issues of the death penalty has become a longstanding matter in the legal circles even to the present day. There are various justifications for the recourse to the death penalty sentence. The primary reasons include that the death penalty acts as a deterrent, it meets the retribution criteria, and that there is an increased public demand for its infliction. On the contrary, there are arguments against the death penalty. The primary reason for its opposition is that it is against human rights. The current global situation portrays Africa as being among the regions of the world where death penalty is rife. Most African nations still have death penalty in their Penal Codes despite there being an emerging trend within the international human rights standards that advocate for its abolition. Moreover, the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights does not mention death penalty. In Africa, the death penalty is thus an issue that necessitates more concern among law practitioners and citizens alike. Introspectively, this study examines the global, regional, and national matters pertaining the death penalty from a human rights perspective.
External References to this Article
Loading reference data...
License Terms
Ownership and Licensing:
Authors of research papers submitted to any journal published by The Law Brigade Publishers retain the copyright of their work while granting the journal specific rights. Authors maintain ownership of the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication. Simultaneously, authors agree to license their research papers under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License.
License Permissions:
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 License, others are permitted to share and adapt the work, even for commercial purposes, provided that appropriate attribution is given to the authors, and acknowledgment is made of the initial publication by The Law Brigade Publishers. This license encourages the broad dissemination and reuse of research papers while ensuring that the original work is properly credited.
Additional Distribution Arrangements:
Authors are free to enter into separate, non-exclusive contractual arrangements for distributing the published version of the work (e.g., posting it to institutional repositories or publishing it in books), provided that the original publication by The Law Brigade Publishers is acknowledged.
Online Posting:
Authors are encouraged to share their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on personal websites) both prior to submission and after publication. This practice can facilitate productive exchanges and increase the visibility and citation of the work.
Responsibility and Liability:
Authors are responsible for ensuring that their submitted research papers do not infringe on the copyright, privacy, or other rights of third parties. The Law Brigade Publishers disclaims any liability for any copyright infringement or violation of third-party rights within the submitted research papers.
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright © 2026 by Stephen Anditi
The copyright and license terms mentioned on this page take precedence over any other license terms mentioned on the article full text PDF or any other material associated with the article.
