COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CASES IN GRANTING CAPITAL PUNISHMENT
Downloads
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55662/Keywords:
capital punishment, law commission, crimesAbstract
The death penalty, otherwise called capital punishment, is an administration authorized practice whereby a man is murdered by the state as a discipline for a wrongdoing. The sentence that somebody be rebuffed in such a way is alluded to as a capital punishment, though the demonstration of doing the sentence is known as an execution. Crimes that are punishable by death are known as capital crimes or capital offences, and they commonly include offences such as murder, treason, war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide., 103 countries have completely abolished capital punishment for all crimes, six have abolished it for ordinary crimes and 30 are abolished it in practice. The Law Commission of India discharged a report in 2015 suggesting that the nation move toward canceling capital punishment, aside from terrorism cases to shield national security in India. India had an execution free time of seven years somewhere in the range of 2004 and 2012. The most recent was the execution of Yakub Memon. The Court discovered him blameworthy of being behind a progression of blasts in Mumbai in 1993, killing more than excess of 250 individuals. On average the courts sentence 129 individuals to death row in India consistently, as indicated by the National Crime Records Bureau. According to driving criminal legal counselors in India, individuals condemned to death by Indian courts confront long delays in preliminaries, trials and appeals . “During this time, the prisoner on death row suffers from extreme agony, anxiety, and fear arising out of an imminent yet uncertain execution,” the Law Commission said
External References to this Article
Loading reference data...
License Terms
Ownership and Licensing:
Authors of research papers submitted to any journal published by The Law Brigade Publishers retain the copyright of their work while granting the journal specific rights. Authors maintain ownership of the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication. Simultaneously, authors agree to license their research papers under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License.
License Permissions:
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 License, others are permitted to share and adapt the work, even for commercial purposes, provided that appropriate attribution is given to the authors, and acknowledgment is made of the initial publication by The Law Brigade Publishers. This license encourages the broad dissemination and reuse of research papers while ensuring that the original work is properly credited.
Additional Distribution Arrangements:
Authors are free to enter into separate, non-exclusive contractual arrangements for distributing the published version of the work (e.g., posting it to institutional repositories or publishing it in books), provided that the original publication by The Law Brigade Publishers is acknowledged.
Online Posting:
Authors are encouraged to share their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on personal websites) both prior to submission and after publication. This practice can facilitate productive exchanges and increase the visibility and citation of the work.
Responsibility and Liability:
Authors are responsible for ensuring that their submitted research papers do not infringe on the copyright, privacy, or other rights of third parties. The Law Brigade Publishers disclaims any liability for any copyright infringement or violation of third-party rights within the submitted research papers.
Citation Metrics
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright © 2026 by Mridhamka Justin
The copyright and license terms mentioned on this page take precedence over any other license terms mentioned on the article full text PDF or any other material associated with the article.
