Exercising the Legal Right to be Forgotten: The Need for an Improved Data Protection and Surveillance Regulation of the Fast-Growing Digital Technology within the Global Space
Downloads
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55662/CLRJ.2025.1107Keywords:
Data Erasure, Data Subject, Search Result, Search Engines, Data ProtectionAbstract
It is the basic duty of nations to guarantee and ensure protection and enforcement of human rights through fundamental establishment of institutional legal frameworks to that effect. This study takes critical look at the efficacy of the available legal mechanisms on the practicability of the exercise of the right to be forgotten. The right to be forgotten is considered to have derived from the human right to privacy, having been established in the case of Costeja Gonzalez and thereafter codified under the General Data Protection Regulation. The right to be forgotten allows a data subject to seek the pulling down of any uncomfortable online personal data from search engines like Google and Amazon. Various territorial jurisdictions have developed diverse concepts and approaches towards the right to be forgotten which is hereunder exhaustively defined in line with the perceptions of different authors and provisions of enabling and extant laws. There are certain conditions that must be satisfied before the exercise of the right to be forgotten can effectively be activated. There is no iron-cast procedure to be followed in the processing of a proper delisting of the personal data of a data subject; but in practice a modality has been adopted by some countries; just as a request for the exercise to be forgotten can be refused for certain reasons like the overriding public interest. Some jurisdictions have allowed extra-territorial application of the right to be forgotten and the sharing of similar data base given the global access to most search engines. Although the right to be forgotten tends to be quite relevant, criticisms abounds, leaving room for improvements, hence this study concludes with recommendations for better modalities towards achieving a more protective and surveillance regulation of the usage of technology to enhance effectual exercise of the legal right to be forgotten.
External References to this Article
Loading reference data...
References
'Are we hardwired for creativity?' 2005, Innovations, radio program transcript, Radio Australia, Melbourne, 14 February, viewed 6 June 2007, http://www.abc.net.au/ra/innovations/stories/s1302318.htm.
Arthur, C 2014, 'Explaining the 'right to be forgotten' - the newest cultural shibboleth', The Guardian, 14 May, viewed 4 August 2025, https://www.theguardian.com.
Arthur, C, 'What is Google deleting under the 'right to be forgotten' and why?', The Guardian, viewed 7 August 2025, https://www.theguardian.com.
Bhattacharya, D 2017, 'Right to be forgotten: How a prudent Karnataka HC judgment could pave the way for privacy laws in india', Firstpost, 7 February, viewed 5 August 2025, https://www.firstpost.com.
Bhattacherya, A 2017, 'In A First, An Indian Court Upholds The 'Right To Be Forgotten'', Live Law, 3 February, viewed 5 August 2025, https://www.livelaw.in.
Carter, LE 2013, 'Argentina's Right to be Forgotten', Brigham Young University, Utah, Faculty Publications, BYU ScholarsArchive, p. 32, viewed 10 September 2025, https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu.
Crovitz, LG 2010, 'Crovitz: Forget any 'Right to be Forgotten', The Wall Street Journal, 15 November, cited in 'Right to be forgotten', Wikipedia, viewed 1 August 2025, https://en.m.wikipedia.org.
Dada, JB 2013, 'Judicial Remedies for Human Rights Violations in Nigeria: A Critical Appraisal', IISTE Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization, vol. 10, p. 1, viewed 13 September 2025, https://www.iiste.org.
Editorial Team, 'What is the right to be forgotten?', IONOS Digital Guide, viewed 9 August 2025, https://www.ionos.com.
Editorial Team 2023, 'What is the right to be forgotten?', IONOS Digital Guide, 17 October, viewed 10 September 2025, https://www.ionos.com.
Effiong, I 2025, 'The Right to be Forgotten under the Data Privacy & Data Protections Laws', IEC, 19 May, viewed 12 August 2025, https://inibeheeffiong.com.
Eng, J 2015, 'Consumer Watchdog: Google should Extend 'Right To Be Forgotten' in US', NBC News, 7 July, viewed 7 August 2025, https://www.nbcnews.com.
'EU court backs 'right to be forgotten in Google case' 2014, BBC News, 13 May, viewed 5 August 2025, https://www.bbc.com.
'EU Privacy Removal', Google, viewed 4 August 2025, https://reportcontent.google.com.
'EU-US Privacy Shield for data struck down by court' 2020, BBC News, 16 July, viewed 7 August 2025, https://www.bbc.com.
Everything you need to know about the "Right to be forgotten", gdpr.eu, viewed 1 August 2025.
Information Commissioner's Office (ICO), 'Right to Erasure', ico.org.uk, viewed 10 August 2025.
Intersoft Consulting, 'GDPR Right to be Forgotten', gdpr-info.eu, viewed 9 August 2025.
Kao, E 2014, 'Privacy watchdogs across Asia may push for 'right to be forgotten ' online, South China Morning Post, 30 December.
Korean Communications Commission Releases Guidelines On 'The Right to Be Forgotten' 2017, Mondaq, 19 January, viewed 6 August 2025, https://www.mondaq.com.
La Justicia Argentina Sobreseyo a Adriana Norena, Directora General de Google 2012, infotechnology.com, 21 September, cited in 'Right to be forgotten', Wikipedia, viewed 1 August 2025, https://en.m.wikipedia.org.
Lapowsky, I 2018, 'California Unanimously Passes Historic Privacy Bill', Wired, 28 June, viewed 7 August 2025, https://www.wired.com.
Legal Help, 'Right to be Forgotten Overview', support.google.com, viewed 9 August 2025.
Lott-Lavigna, R 2019, 'The Weird rise of cyber funeral', Wired UK, 17 February, viewed 7 August 2025, https://www.wired.com.
Mitrou, L & Karyda, M 2012, 'EU's Data Protection Reform and the right to be forgotten - A Legal response to technological challenge?', 5th International Conference of Information Law and Ethics, Greece, 29-30 June, SSRN 2165245.
Nzekwe, I, 'Understanding the "Right to be forgotten" and its applicability under Nigerian law', Templars, viewed 7 August 2025, https://www.templars-law.com.
'Oblivion Is the Software That Could Atomate the 'Right to Be Forgotten' 2015, Motherboard, 22 June, viewed 7 August 2025, https://www.vice.com.
Omesiete, JN 2021, 'Analyzing The Right to be Forgotten Under Nigerian Jurisprudence', The Palm, 11 April, viewed 14 August 2025, https://thepalmagazine.com.
Orlowski, A 2014, 'Google de-listing of BBC article 'broke UK and Euro public interest laws' So WHY do it', The Register, 4 July, viewed 4 August 2025, https://www.theregister.co.uk.
Powles, J 2014, 'what did the media miss with the 'right to be forgotten' coverage?, The Guardian, 21 May.
Right to be forgotten, Wikipedia, viewed 1 August 2025, https://en.m.wikipedia.org.
Sixth Tone 2016, 'Chinese Have No Right to be Forgotten, Court Rules', Sixth Tone, 5 May, cited in 'Right to be forgotten', Wikipedia, viewed 1 August 2025, https://en.m.wikipedia.org.
South Korean Releases Right to be Forgotten Guidance 2016, Bloomberg Industry Group, 23 May, viewed 5 August 2016, https://bloombergindustry.com.
Thomson Reuters, 'Right to be forgotten - erasing your private information from cyberspace', legal.thomsonreuters.com, viewed 9 August 2025.
Vaas, L 2019, 'Google Wins landmark case: Right to be forgotten only applies in EU', 25 September, achieved from the original on 23 January 2023, https://en.m.wikipedia.org, viewed 1 August 2025.
Villamar, L 2015, 'Expert Google Cannot Escape French Law on right to Be Forgotten', Yibada, 22 September, cited in 'Right to be forgotten', Wikipedia, viewed 1 August 2025, https://en.m.wikipedia.org.
White House Office of the Press Secretary 2012, 'Fact Sheet: Plan to Protect Privacy in the Internet Age by Adopting a Consumer Privacy Bill of Rights', obamawhitehouse.archive.gov, 23 August, viewed 5 August 2025, https://obamawhitehouse.archive.gov.
Wong, Q 2023, 'Newsom signs bill that would maka it easier to delete online personal data', Los Angeles Times, 10 October, viewed 7 August 2025, https://www.latimes.com.
Books, Reports, and Chapter Contributions
Coliver, S (ed.) 1992, Striking a Balance, Hate Speech, Freedom of Expression and Non-Discrimination, International Centre against Censorship, Human Rights Centre, University of Essex, Article 19.
Haleem, M 1989, 'The Domestic Application of International Human Rights Norms' in Developing Human Rights Jurisprudence, Commonwealth Secretariat, p. 73.
Weber, RH 2011, 'The right to be forgotten: more than a Pandora's Box, Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law, 2, pp. 120-130.
Zhang, AH 2024, High Wire: How China Regulates Big Tech and Govern Its Economy, Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197682258.001.0001
Volokh, E 2000, 'Freedom of Speech, Information Privacy, and the Troubling Implication of a Right to Stop People from Speaking about You', Standard Law Review, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 1049-1124, JSTOR, https://www.jstor.org.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1229510
Whitman, JQ 2004, 'The Two Western Cultures of Privacy: Dignity Versus Liberty', Yale Law Journal, vol. 113, no. 6, pp. 1151-1221, JSTOR, https://www.jstor.org.
https://doi.org/10.2307/4135723
C-507/17 (CNIL) (2019).
C-460/20 TU, InfoCuria Case-law, viewed 4 August 2025, https://curia.europa.eu.
Google Spain SL and Google Inc. v. Agencia Espanola de Proteccion de Dato (AEPD) and Mario Costeja Gonzalez (2014) CJEU (Court of Justice European Union).
Melvin v. Reid (1931) 112 Cal.App. 285, 297, P. 91.
Sidis v. F-R Publishing Corporation (1940) 311 US 711 61 S. Ct. 393 85 L. Ed. 462 1940 US.
Suit No. IKD/3191GCM/2019 (Unreported judgment delivered on 26 October 2021).
Suit No. LD/17392MFHR/2024 (Unreported).
Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cwith), viewed 20 November 2009, http://www.comlaw.gov.au/.
UN Charter 1945.
License Terms
Ownership and Licensing:
Authors of research papers submitted to any journal published by The Law Brigade Publishers retain the copyright of their work while granting the journal specific rights. Authors maintain ownership of the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication. Simultaneously, authors agree to license their research papers under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License.
License Permissions:
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 License, others are permitted to share and adapt the work, even for commercial purposes, provided that appropriate attribution is given to the authors, and acknowledgment is made of the initial publication by The Law Brigade Publishers. This license encourages the broad dissemination and reuse of research papers while ensuring that the original work is properly credited.
Additional Distribution Arrangements:
Authors are free to enter into separate, non-exclusive contractual arrangements for distributing the published version of the work (e.g., posting it to institutional repositories or publishing it in books), provided that the original publication by The Law Brigade Publishers is acknowledged.
Online Posting:
Authors are encouraged to share their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on personal websites) both prior to submission and after publication. This practice can facilitate productive exchanges and increase the visibility and citation of the work.
Responsibility and Liability:
Authors are responsible for ensuring that their submitted research papers do not infringe on the copyright, privacy, or other rights of third parties. The Law Brigade Publishers disclaims any liability for any copyright infringement or violation of third-party rights within the submitted research papers.
Citation Metrics
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright © 2026 by Afeimhoikike Oyaletor
The copyright and license terms mentioned on this page take precedence over any other license terms mentioned on the article full text PDF or any other material associated with the article.
